Continued ... React Native and Expo Timestamp app (mobile and web)

Last updated on 29 Jun 2025

I am continuing earlier Using ChatGPT and Gemini to write React Native and Expo Timestamp app (mobile and web) post here as that has become very long.

If the Android Timestamp Tracker (TT) app is already running but not in view on the phone, and I try to open it, it simply switches to the open Android app. That's fine but the problem is that even in such scenarios I would like a timestamp to be automatically created. If the app was not open, a timestamp gets created on open. If the app is already open but not in view, the timestamp does NOT get created.

I asked Gemini (Gem): Is there an event handler we can use in React Native that runs on the Android app screen that was not being shown, coming into view when user attempts to open the already open app?

Gemini gave me a solution. It said:

Here's how you can achieve automatic timestamp creation when your React Native (Expo) Android app comes into view from the background, even if it was already open:

The key is to use the AppState API from React Native. This API tells you about the current state of the application.

Here's a detailed explanation and code example:

Understanding `AppState`

The AppState module provides information about the current foreground/background state of the application. You can subscribe to changes in this state to detect when your app comes to the foreground.

The relevant AppState states are:

active: The app is running in the foreground.
background: The app is running in the background.

Solution

You'll set up an event listener that triggers a function whenever the AppState changes to active.

-----------

The code Gemini gave initially made some presumptions about the App as I had started a new chat. So I shared relevant code snippets from my app and got suitable code for my App. But that code had an unusual issue ...

Me: On switching to Android app which was open earlier but not in view, it clears the existing timestamps and adds the current timestamp. I can't understand why it clears existing timestamps.

Gem provided the fix which worked. I am providing the key code snippets below after which I will share Gem's explanation.

useEffect(() => {

const loadData = async () => {

try {

const stored = await AsyncStorage.getItem(STORAGE_KEY);

const parsed = stored ? JSON.parse(stored) : [];

// The original code was adding a timestamp here on every load.

// This implicitly handles the "app not open, timestamp gets created on open" part.

// If 'parsed' contains existing timestamps, this will prepend the new one

// without clearing them, unless the list length exceeds 100 and it truncates.

const nowOnLoad = new Date().toISOString();

const updatedOnLoad = [nowOnLoad, ...parsed].slice(0, 100);

setTimestamps(updatedOnLoad);

await AsyncStorage.setItem(STORAGE_KEY, JSON.stringify(updatedOnLoad));

console.log("Timestamps loaded and initial timestamp added/updated:", updatedOnLoad.length);

} catch (error) {

console.error("Error loading timestamps:", error);

Alert.alert("Error", "Something went wrong while loading timestamps.");

}

};

// Set up the AppState change listener

const appStateSubscription = AppState.addEventListener('change', nextAppState => {

// Check if the app was in the background/inactive and is now active (came to foreground)

// This specifically handles the case where the app was already open but not in view.

if (appState.current.match(/inactive|background/) && nextAppState === 'active') {

console.log('App has come to the foreground!');

// Call addTimestamp, which will now use the latest state due to functional update

addTimestamp();

}

// Always update the current app state reference for the next comparison

appState.current = nextAppState;

});

loadData(); // Call loadData on component mount to load existing and add initial timestamp

// Cleanup function for the useEffect hook.

// This runs when the component unmounts.

return () => {

// Remove the AppState event listener to prevent memory leaks.

appStateSubscription.remove();

};

}, []); // Empty dependency array ensures this effect runs only once on mount

-------

Me (to Gem): I copy-pasted the App.js you updated into my project and reloaded the app via Metro (on Expo Go). Now it works. A new timestamp gets added when the app is opened, and when it is brought to foreground from background. Great!

But can you explain to me what exactly is this functional update and how that feature fixed the problem.

Gem: You're asking for an explanation of the functional update feature in React's useState and how it solved the issue you were experiencing. I'm glad to hear the fix worked!

Here's the explanation:

What is a Functional Update with `useState`?

When you update state in React using useState, you typically do something like this:

setCount(count + 1);
setTimestamps(updatedArray);

This works fine for most cases. However, when your state update depends on the previous state, and that state might have changed between when your function was defined and when it actually executes, you can run into issues with "stale closures."

A functional update addresses this by allowing you to pass a function to your state setter instead of a direct value:

setCount(prevCount => prevCount + 1);
setTimestamps(prevTimestamps => [...prevTimestamps, newTimestamp]);

When you pass a function to setCount or setTimestamps, React will call that function, providing the latest, most up-to-date state as the first argument (prevCount or prevTimestamps). Whatever this function returns becomes the new state.

How it Fixed Your Problem

Your addTimestamp function was initially structured like this:

const addTimestamp = async () => {
  const now = new Date().toISOString();
  const updated = [now, ...timestamps].slice(0, 100); // Problematic line
  setTimestamps(updated);
  // ... AsyncStorage save
};

The issue arose because of how JavaScript closures work in combination with React's rendering cycle:

When your App component initially renders, or when the useEffect hook runs for the first time, the addTimestamp function is defined.
At the moment addTimestamp is defined, it "closes over" (captures) the timestamps value that was present at that exact time. If loadData hadn't completed yet, or if a previous re-render had caused timestamps to temporarily be [] (an empty array), addTimestamp would hold onto that stale [] value.
When the AppState listener triggered addTimestamp later (e.g., when the app came to the foreground), addTimestamp would use the timestamps array it had captured, which was likely an empty [].
So, [now, ...[]] would result in [now], effectively clearing any previously loaded timestamps and only showing the new one.

By changing setTimestamps to its functional form:

setTimestamps(prevTimestamps => {
  const updated = [now, ...prevTimestamps].slice(0, 100);
  // ... AsyncStorage save
  return updated;
});

React guarantees that prevTimestamps inside this function will always be the absolute latest state value. Even if addTimestamp was called from an event listener that captured an older timestamps value, React intercepts this and provides the most current state, ensuring your new timestamp is added to the full, existing list rather than an empty one.

In essence, the functional update makes your state updates more robust and predictable, especially in asynchronous scenarios or when multiple updates might occur in quick succession.

Me: Hmm. I think this is the first time I have encountered this ("stale closure" issue) in my React programming work for over a year (unless this bug is specific to React Native and Expo Go). Your explanation is clear. thanks. This is a good learning for me. [Update after chat: I was aware of "updater function" in useState, https://react.dev/reference/react/useState#updating-state-based-on-the-previous-state , and had even used it in the past for some other reasons (not 'stale closure'), IIRC.. Gem confirmed that functional update is the same as updater function.]

Gem: That's excellent to hear! I'm really glad the explanation was clear and that this was a valuable learning experience for you.

You're right to observe that this particular kind of stale closure bug, while present in all React environments, can sometimes feel more pronounced or pop up in unexpected ways in React Native/Expo Go due to how app lifecycle events (like AppState changes) interact with the JavaScript bridge and render cycles. In web React, you might encounter similar issues with setInterval or event listeners that are not properly cleaned up or updated.

It's a common pattern that trips up many React developers, even experienced ones, and understanding functional updates is a key step in writing more robust and predictable React code.

-----

Me: I would like the app to be modified such that user is asked whether a timestamp should be added when the app is already open and comes to the foreground. Further if the user does not make a choice in 2 seconds, it should be presumed that the timestamp should NOT be added and the box asking user this question should go away. This way, especially on the web app, unnecessary timestamps will not get added simply when user brings the app tab/window to the foreground. Note that at app open time and when the Add Timestamp buttons are pressed, this question should NOT be asked and the timestamp should get added, as is the current behaviour of the app.

Gem: Okay, this is a very thoughtful request, especially considering the user experience on both mobile and web. We'll implement a custom modal with a 2-second timeout for the "app coming to foreground" scenario, while leaving the initial launch and manual button presses as immediate timestamp additions.

[Gem provided the App.js code in full in its 'Canvas'. I copy-pasted the code over my existing App.js and tested the app.]

Me: Seems to work like a charm on both Android app and web. u r awesome!

----

Me; Now I would like to add the feature of optionally adding/modifying a note to an existing Timestamp entry. The user can invoke this feature by pressing or clicking on the Timestamp entry. After the user adds a note, the app should show the beginning part of the note as a single line (based on window width) in the related Timestamp entry in the Timestamp list of the main screen. This line should be shown after Interval line of the Timestamp entry.

Also in the modal where the user can key in the note for a Timestamp entry, a delete button option should also be provided. If the user clicks/presses the delete button, a confirmation should be asked of the user. On user confirming the delete, that particular timesheet entry should be deleted from the timesheet list.

Gem: To add the functionality of associating notes with timestamps and allowing users to edit or delete them, we'll modify the App.js file.

Here's a breakdown of the changes:

Timestamp Data Structure: Timestamps will now be objects { time: string, note: string } instead of just strings.
Note Editor Modal: A new modal (TimestampNoteModal) will be introduced, which appears when a user clicks on a timestamp entry.
- It will contain a TextInput for editing the note.
- It will have "Save Note", "Delete Timestamp", and "Cancel" buttons.
FlatList Item Interaction: Each FlatList item will become Pressable to trigger the note editor modal.
Displaying Notes: A truncated version of the note will be displayed directly within the timestamp entry in the main list.
Deletion Confirmation: A confirmation dialog will appear before deleting a timestamp entry.
Export with Notes: The export functionality will be updated to include notes in the CSV.

Here's the updated App.js code:

Summary of Key Changes:

Timestamp Data Structure Update:
- The timestamps state now holds an array of objects like { time: "ISOString", note: "Optional note text" }.
- addTimestamp now creates entries with an empty note property by default.
- Backward Compatibility in loadData: The loadData function includes logic to convert old string-only timestamps from AsyncStorage into the new object format upon loading. This ensures existing data isn't lost.
Note Editing Modal (isNoteModalVisible):
- New state variables isNoteModalVisible, currentNoteText, and editingTimestampIndex are introduced to manage the modal's state and the data being edited.
- The Modal component for note editing is added to the render section.
- It contains a TextInput for currentNoteText and "Save Note", "Delete TS", and "Cancel" buttons.
FlatList Item Pressability (Pressable):
- Each item in the FlatList is now wrapped in a Pressable component.
- onPress={() => openNoteModal(index)} calls a new function openNoteModal when an item is clicked, passing the index of the timestamp to be edited.
- itemPressed style provides visual feedback when a list item is pressed.
openNoteModal Function:
- Sets editingTimestampIndex to the index of the clicked timestamp.
- Initializes currentNoteText with the existing note of that timestamp.
- Sets isNoteModalVisible(true) to display the modal.
saveNote Function:
- Uses a functional update for setTimestamps to ensure it's working with the latest state.
- Creates a copy of the timestamps array and updates the note property of the editingTimestampIndex entry with currentNoteText.
- Calls saveTimestampsToStorage to persist the changes.
- Resets modal-related states and hides the modal.
deleteTimestamp Function:
- Prompts the user for confirmation using Alert.alert (mobile) or window.confirm (web).
- If confirmed, it filters the timestamps array to remove the selected entry.
- Calls saveTimestampsToStorage to persist the deletion.
- Resets modal-related states and hides the modal.
Displaying Note in renderItem:
- Inside renderItem, item.note is conditionally rendered after the Interval line.
- numberOfLines={1} and ellipsizeMode="tail" are used to display only the beginning of the note on a single line, followed by "..." if it's too long.
exportTimestamps Update:
- The CSV header now includes a "Note" column.
- The csvBody mapping is updated to include the item.note, with proper CSV escaping (replace(/"/g, '""')) to handle notes containing commas or quotes.
keyExtractor Update: Changed to keyExtractor={(item, index) => item.time + index.toString()} to ensure uniqueness now that item is an object.

This comprehensive update provides the requested note functionality, including editing, deletion, and display, while maintaining the existing features and desired user experience for app foregrounding.

Me: I modified the timeout to be 5 seconds and also changed the text in the 'from foreground' modal. I have copy pasted the updated code in the 'canvas', if I got the 'canvas' term correctly.

I tested the app both on phone and web (Expo Go env.). The app works as expected.

I am astounded at what you have been able to do within minutes if not seconds. This would have surely taken me much much longer if I had hand coded these changes. U r really a great assistant. Thanks a ton

----

Me: I would like to try out the release APK. So I want to do a release build. As we have not added any packages in the changes we have done in this chat session which made changes on the app.js of previous release APK, I think I can skip the expo prebuild command. What do u say?

Gem agreed.

----

I then ran:

npx expo-doctor. It reported: 15/15 checks passed. No issues detected!

my-release-key.keystore file had already been copied to android/app/. android/gradle.properties and android/app/build.gradle had already been set up correctly in previous release build. I checked that these files are there in android directory and have the changes I had made before earlier release build.

Now there was some confusion in my interaction with Gem. In another chat, Gem had suggested using: npx expo build:android --type apk. But when I asked it now, it said it is deprecated and that I should use eas build. I chose to then go with what I had used for earlier release build. So ran:

cd android

.\gradlew.bat assembleRelease

BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 1m

---------

That was quite fast!

I copied and installed the release APK on phone. Then I tapped on it to update the app which it did. Now the release app runs as expected with the features I had asked above and were implemented in Expo Go Android app and web app.

Me: How do I indicate to the user that clicking or tapping on the timestamp entry will allow him/her to add/edit a note (or delete the timestamp entry)? On web app, the code shows a hand icon which will indicate to a savvy user that click is enabled. But on Android app, how does the user know? Should we add a pencil icon at the end of the entry's timestamp text? Pencil icon is a clear indicator of edit feature and click or tap to initiate it.

Gem: You've hit on a very important point regarding user experience, especially for discoverability on mobile platforms! The hand cursor on web is a subtle hint, but Android users often expect a more explicit visual cue for interactivity.

Adding a pencil icon at the end of each timestamp entry is an excellent idea. It's a universally recognized symbol for "edit" and will clearly indicate to users that they can tap or click to interact with the entry.

The most common and robust way to use icons in React Native and Expo projects is with the react-native-vector-icons library. Many Expo projects already use it, as it provides a vast collection of customizable icons.

----

Gem provided the code.

I also had to run: npx expo install react-native-vector-icons

Me: The pencil icon does show well on Android app. But I get this warning: ERROR Warning: Text strings must be rendered within a <Text> component.

Gem: I understand you're encountering a "Text strings must be rendered within a <Text> component" warning on the Android app, despite the pencil icon showing correctly. This warning typically occurs when plain text is placed directly inside a <View> or Pressable component without being wrapped in a <Text> component.

Upon reviewing the provided code in the "app-js-updated-icon" Canvas, the renderItem function already correctly wraps all dynamic text within <Text> components. The Feather icon is also a component, not a text string. This suggests the warning is highly subtle, potentially related to implicit whitespace in JSX, or might even be originating from another part of your app or a caching issue.

To address the most common, albeit subtle, cause in situations like this where the code visually appears correct, I've made a very minor adjustment in the renderItem's JSX formatting to ensure there is no unintentional whitespace between the itemTextContent View and the Feather icon. This can sometimes prevent React Native from interpreting incidental newlines or spaces as standalone text nodes.

---

Gem provided the code which needed an additional round to get the code to work as expected.

Me: Now I would like the top row of buttons in the main screen to be a combination of icon and small font text. I think we can have icon in a small top row and the small font text in another row below it. I would also like to add a Settings button (icon and text in small font). I think once the font is made small there will be enough room to add the Settings button in the top row.

The bottom row button (Add Timestamp) is intentionally wide so as to allow easy tap on mobile. I think both the icon and text can fit in the same row in the bottom row button.

Gem: I understand you'd like to update the appearance and layout of the buttons on your app's main screen, using a combination of icons and smaller text. You also want to add a new "Settings" button to the top row.

Here's the modified App.js Canvas with these changes:

Summary of Changes:

Top Row Buttons (Add TS, Export, Clear, Info, Settings):
- Replaced Button with Pressable: This allows for complete customizability of button content and styling.
- Icon and Text Layout:
  - Each Pressable contains an inner View with styles.iconButtonContent.
  - styles.iconButtonContent uses alignItems: 'center' to stack the icon and text vertically.
  - Feather icons are used (plus-circle, share, trash-2, info, settings).
  - A Text component holds the button label, styled with styles.iconButtonText for a small font size (fontSize: 11) and a marginTop to create space from the icon.
- Styling (styles.iconButton):
  - flex: 1, minWidth, and maxWidth are used to make the buttons responsive and distribute space evenly, while ensuring they don't become too small or too large.
  - aspectRatio: 1 makes them square, which often looks good for icon buttons.
  - justifyContent: 'space-around' in styles.buttonRow helps distribute these buttons horizontally.
- New "Settings" Button: A new Pressable element for "Settings" has been added, calling a placeholder openSettingsModal function (which currently shows an Alert). A isSettingsModalVisible state and a basic Settings Modal placeholder are also included for future expansion.
Bottom "Add Timestamp" Button:
- Replaced Button with Pressable: Again, for custom layout.
- Icon and Text in Same Row:
  - An inner View (styles.largeButtonContent) is used with flexDirection: 'row' and alignItems: 'center'.
  - gap: 10 provides spacing between the icon and text.
  - The icon is Feather name="plus-circle" with a larger size={30}.
  - The Text component (styles.largeButtonText) has a larger fontSize (18) and is set to fontWeight: 'bold'.
- Styling (styles.largeButton):
  - Includes a distinct background color, padding, and subtle shadows to make it prominent and easily tappable as intended.
Overall Layout Adjustments:
- styles.buttonRow now uses justifyContent: 'space-around' and flexWrap: 'wrap' to handle the horizontal distribution and potential wrapping of the top row buttons if the screen is very narrow.
- A gap: 5 is added to styles.buttonRow for spacing between buttons.

These changes should give your app a more modern and intuitive feel, especially on mobile, by making the button functionalities visually clear through icons.

Me: The icon buttons work! Great. Look wise too they are good but for small issues which I will mention later. Icon selection is also good.

The issues are:

1) The bottom button continues to have the earlier blue background with white text in dark mode. But in light mode the colour changes. In earlier app, the colours were same for all the buttons in light and dark mode. I would like to follow that approach, as of now at least, as that looked quite OK in both dark and light modes.

2) The top row icon buttons have grey background now. Can that be changed to the earlier blue backgound?

----

Gem provided code to fix the issue. But there were still some small UI/UX issues.

==============
==============

14 June 2025

Continuing with earlier App.js work ...

Current issues:

a) ERROR Warning: Text strings must be rendered within a <Text> component.

b) In light mode, web app timestamp entry text is not visible.

Additional feature I want: When a timestamp is added there should be a strong visual cue of it having been added. What visual cue do you suggest?

----

Gem provided code. Gem said:

Text strings must be rendered within a <Text> component warning:

I've re-examined the renderItem carefully. The most common culprit in such seemingly correct JSX is an accidental newline or space between components.
I've ensured <Feather is directly next to </View> to eliminate any implicit whitespace between them.
I also made a small enhancement in loadData's backward compatibility to ensure note property always exists.

----

Me: Oh! When I had last used the earlier App.js I faced the issue of : In light mode, web app timestamp entry text is not visible.

AFter I sent you my above prompt and you responded with modified App.js, before replacing my App.js with your App.js, I checked the app again. This time it is showing correctly with older App.js code itself! So maybe it was a flaky problem I faced earlier perhaps related to me using Windows High Contrast off and on. Should I go ahead anyway with the App.js you have provided?

Gem said yes.

Me: The "ERROR Warning: Text strings must be rendered within a <Text> component" does not appear now. So that's fixed.

In light mode, web app timestamp entry text is visible. So that's fixed too.

The visual cue for a timestamp being added is working and is good. But there is one issue. If the user has scrolled down the list of timestamps such that top entries are not viewable, and then the user adds a timestamp then the visual cue is not seen. I think it will be OK if we scroll to top every time a new timestamp is added, in which case the visual cue will be seen.

----

Gem provided code ...

Me: The scroll to top on Add TS works well. The visual cue is clearly seen even if Add was done when top of list was not in view.

Now I don't think the brought to foreground modal is needed. User can check for visual cue when app is opened and if app was already running and only brought to foreground, user will not see the visual cue. That means that the user has to click Add Timestamp to add a new timestamp. The brought to foreground modal tends to pop up quite frequently and forces the user to close it or wait for it to auto close. So I think visual cue that we have now is good enough and the brought to foreground modal is not needed. So can you please delete the brought to foreground modal related code. Note that I have committed the brought to foreground modal code in past commits to local as well as remote (GitHub) repo. So if I want to revert, I can easily get the related code.

----

Gem provided code ... Had a compilation error fix round ...

Me: Great! code works well. Please delete the AppState subscription/listener code as well as we don't need it now.

I want to change the edit and delete UI for timestamp entries. Let us have an edit icon followed by a delete icon towards the end of each timestamp entry. If the user taps/clicks on the delete icon-button, the confirm dialog should be shown and on confirmation the timestamp entry should be deleted. It the user clicks on the edit icon-button or any other part of the timestamp entry excluding the delete icon button, the Edit Timestamp Note dialog should be shown as the code currently does.

In the Edit Timestamp Note dialog:

a) we can remove the DELETE TS button now.

b) Please add Interval too below the Timestamp entry text

c) Increase height of the TextInput element (where user keys in note) as well as Edit Timestamp Note dialog to enable user to see more text of a long note without scrolling.

---

Gem provided code ...

Me: Works well! Awesome. Can we have rounded buttons in the Edit Note dialog?

----

Gem provided code ...

Me: The buttons are rounded. They look nice.

Now I think I will update the Info dialog text by myself. I will also comment out Settings icon-button by myself.

Next I will create a release for web and android.

For android, since we added icons and I had to run: 'npx expo install react-native-vector-icons', I think I will have to do an expo prebuild again. Am I right? Note that I do the build locally and don't use eas.

==========

Gem said yes.

Me: I am going through App.js code now ... Some questions:

In the following code:

const addTimestamp = async () => {

const now = new Date().toISOString();

const newTimestampEntry = { id: Date.now().toString(), time: now, note: '' };

---

Are we sure id will be unique? What if the user Adds two timestamps within the same second (different milliseconds)?

Gem: You've raised a very important and insightful point regarding the uniqueness of the id!

You are absolutely correct. Date.now() returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix epoch. If a user manages to tap the "Add Timestamp" button twice within the exact same millisecond, Date.now() would indeed return the same value for both, leading to duplicate ids. While unlikely in typical human interaction, it's definitely a possibility, especially on fast devices or web where clicks can be processed very quickly.

Why `Date.now()` alone is not always unique:

Millisecond Precision: Date.now() provides millisecond precision. If two events occur within that same millisecond, they get the same timestamp.
System Clock: It relies on the system clock.

The Fix: Combine Timestamp with a Random Component

The most common and robust way to ensure a highly unique ID in this scenario is to combine the millisecond timestamp with a short, randomly generated string. This makes the chance of a collision extremely low.

Here's how we can modify the id generation:

// Example of how to generate a unique ID
Date.now().toString(36) + Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 8)

Date.now().toString(36): Converts the millisecond timestamp to a base-36 string (using letters and numbers), making it shorter and less predictable.
Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 8): Generates a random number, converts it to base-36, and then takes a small substring (e.g., 6 characters) to append. This random part is the key to uniqueness even if Date.now() is the same.

Updated `addTimestamp` Function

I will update your App.js using this improved ID generation method for all places where new IDs are created.

Me: Hmm. I had thought of the case of same second but different milliseconds. I was wondering whether your earlier code handled it. Now with your explantaion it is clear that your code does handle it.

But u have raised an interesting possibility of milliseconds also being same perhaps on web. Hmm. I had not thought of that case. But as you have given me code to take care of that case too, I think I should go with your updated code. What do u say?

Gem: Yes, I absolutely recommend going with the updated code that uses the generateUniqueId helper function.

You're very astute to consider the edge case of multiple operations within the same millisecond, especially on web platforms or very fast environments. While Date.now() is generally good, relying solely on it for unique IDs can lead to rare but frustrating collisions.

The Date.now().toString(36) + Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 8) method is a widely accepted and very robust way to create client-side unique IDs without needing a heavy UUID library. It virtually eliminates the possibility of duplicate IDs, ensuring the reliability of your timestamp entries for both storage and UI rendering (especially for keyExtractor in FlatList).

So, definitely proceed with the latest App.js! It's a small but significant improvement for the app's stability and data integrity.

Me: Used the new App.js u provided. It seems to work OK. I tried adding many timestamps one after the other as fast as I could - that was handled well on both android and web. On my Samsung M21 (low to middle end) Android phone, I was able to get a 1 ms interval but not 0 ms interval. I was surprised that I got a 1 ms interval. Hmm. I think surely a high-end phone could get 0ms intervals and so your new code will handle that.

Noted that u also commented out Settings. That was helpful.

Gem: That's excellent news! I'm really happy to hear that the latest App.js is working well for you, and especially that it handles rapid timestamp additions robustly on both your Android phone and the web.

Your observation about the 1ms interval on your Samsung M21 is very interesting and quite typical! Even with fast processing, there's usually a tiny, measurable delay between consecutive execution calls. High-end devices or certain operating system optimizations might indeed occasionally hit a 0ms scenario, but 1ms or higher is common.

This just reinforces why adding the Math.random() component to the ID generation was a good proactive step. It provides an extremely high degree of uniqueness, effectively eliminating the possibility of collisions even if Date.now() were to return the same value within extremely tight timings.

Glad the commented-out "Settings" button was helpful too!

It sounds like your Timestamp Tracker is in a really solid state now. If you have any more ideas or need further assistance in the future, don't hesitate to reach out!

Me: I am commenting out following lines in above useEffect():

const appStateSubscription = AppState.addEventListener('change', nextAppState => {

appState.current = nextAppState;

console.log('App State changed to:', appState.current);

});

...

appStateSubscription.remove();

----

So the AppState event listener will not get added nor removed. I presume that's OK.

Gem was OK with above.

Made above change. Also modified Info modal text.

Changed Add TS to Add

Version change 1.1.0 in package.json

I have updated the canvas with my latest App.js. I want one change.

Info modal Dismiss button has to be rounded. Also if text in Info modal is more than window height can accommodate, scrolling facility for the text should be provided. The Dismiss button should always be accessible at bottom of modal (irrespective of scroll position).

...

Gem provided code ...

Updated App.js ....

On Android, each line in Info modal is clipped and does not wrap but on web it wraps.

Also the dismiss button height is too small. On Android, the Dismiss label is also not seen within the button but on web the Dismiss label is seen. Dark and Light mode seem to be handled OK in both Android and web.

----

For the first time in these interactions with Gemini, I got an error message:

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your request again

-----

I tried again. This time it went through ... did not take very long - less than a minute or perhaps less than 30 secs.

Gem: It sounds like we're close to perfecting the Info modal! The issues you're describing, where text clips on Android but wraps on the web, and the Dismiss button appears too small with hidden text on Android, often point to subtle differences in how React Native's layout engine behaves across platforms, especially with ScrollView and nested Text components.

I've updated the App.js code in the Canvas to address these specific rendering inconsistencies, focusing on ensuring proper text wrapping and button sizing across both Android and Web platforms.

Here's a breakdown of the adjustments:

Info Modal Text Wrapping (Android Clipping Fix):
- I've made the ScrollView's content container (styles.infoModalContent) explicitly stretch to width: '100%' and changed its alignItems to 'flex-start'. This ensures that the text content within the scrollable area correctly utilizes the full available width and aligns text from the left, preventing clipping and allowing proper wrapping.
- I've also removed width: '100%' from styles.modalText itself, allowing it to naturally fill its parent's width, which is now correctly managed by the ScrollView's content container.
Info Modal Dismiss Button (Height and Label Visibility):
- I've increased the paddingVertical for styles.modalButton from 10 to 14. This provides more vertical space within the button, ensuring the "Dismiss" text has ample room to display without being clipped. This larger padding should make the button more comfortably tappable on mobile as well.

These changes should resolve the layout and text visibility issues you're seeing on Android for the Info modal, bringing its appearance and behavior in line with the web version.

Please update your App.js with the code from the Canvas and let me know how it looks!

[Code had a syntax error ... import * => from 'expo-localization'; ... I have encountered this => error with Gem quite a few times now. But it fixes it on telling it.]

----

Had some rounds ...

Me: scrolling is fixed. Works on both android and web.

Dismiss button text not visible issue continues on Android. I tried out some variations. Here's the related code:

<Pressable

onPress={() => setIsInfoModalVisible(false)}

style ={[ {backgroundColor: '#007bff'}]}

// style ={[ {borderRadius: 8, paddingVertical: 14, paddingHorizontal: 15,flex: 1, alignItems: 'center', justifyContent: 'center',backgroundColor: '#007bff'}]}

// style={({ pressed }) => [styles.modalButton, pressed && styles.modalButtonPressed, styles.infoDismissButton]}

<Text style={[styles.modalButtonText, { color: '#fff' }]}>Dismiss</Text>

</Pressable>

----

This shows the Dismiss text (white colour).

The other two commented style statements do not show Dismiss text.

Perhaps this issue may not be there in release and could be an Expo issue.

So I don't want to spend too much time on this now unless the above info. helps you to give me a solution now.

----

=============

Gem: The issue you're facing with the "Dismiss" button text not being visible on Android while it works on the web, especially when using combined styles, is a common React Native layout quirk. It often stems from how Flexbox properties (like flex, alignItems, justifyContent) interact differently across platforms, or how the available space is calculated for nested components.

The fact that style ={[ {backgroundColor: '#007bff'}]} makes the text visible strongly suggests that one of the more complex Flexbox rules (flex: 1, alignItems: 'center', justifyContent: 'center') applied via styles.modalButton or styles.infoDismissButton is unintentionally collapsing the text content area on Android.

To fix this, I've implemented a more robust styling approach that separates the generic button styling from layout-specific properties:

Refined styles.modalButton:
- I've removed flex: 1 from styles.modalButton. This style should only define the visual appearance (background, border-radius, padding, basic centering of its own content).
- alignItems: 'center' and justifyContent: 'center' are retained on modalButton to vertically and horizontally center the text within the button's own bounds.
Explicit Layout for modalButtonRow buttons:
- For the buttons in modalButtonRow (e.g., Save Note, Cancel), flex: 1 is now applied directly in their style array: style={({ pressed }) => [styles.modalButton, pressed && styles.modalButtonPressed, { flex: 1 }]}. This ensures they correctly distribute space within their horizontal row.
Explicit Layout for infoDismissButton:
- For the "Dismiss" button in the Info Modal, width: '100%' and marginTop: 20 are applied directly in its style array: style={({ pressed }) => [styles.modalButton, pressed && styles.modalButtonPressed, { width: '100%', marginTop: 20 }]}. This guarantees it takes the full width and proper vertical spacing. By removing flex: 1 from modalButton itself, we avoid potential conflicts when this button is used as a standalone element.
Ensured modalButtonText Centering:
- I've explicitly added textAlign: 'center' to styles.modalButtonText. While alignItems: 'center' on the parent button should handle horizontal centering, being explicit on the text itself can sometimes resolve rendering oddities on certain platforms or text lengths.

These changes provide more precise control over how each button renders, especially on Android, and should prevent the text from being clipped or invisible.

Please update your App.js with the following code and test it on Android again.

Me: That works. Now Dismiss button text is clearly shown in Android. Hmm.

One possible Android general UI issue: That the Info modal has text below what is shown is not clear to the user unless user swipes at which time the scrollbar appears. On Web scrollbar clearly appears and the user can see that it indicates more text below what has been shown. What r ur thoughts on this?

Gem said this is common UX in Android and no need to change it. Alternatives are complex ... "Since the scrolling functionality itself works, and the behavior is typical for Android, I would generally recommend sticking with the current approach. Users accustomed to Android apps are often familiar with swiping to reveal more content when they suspect it's there."

Me: OK. I will go with your advice for now.

-----

Me: As preparation for release, I have changed version in package.json to 1.1.0 (from earlier 1.0.0). Do I need to specify new version number elsewhere too?

Gem: You're on the right track by updating package.json! That's a good first step for project versioning.

However, for an Expo/React Native app, especially when doing local builds after expo prebuild, the most critical file for setting the app's version number for platform-specific releases (Android APK/AAB or iOS IPA) is app.json (or app.config.js if you're using a JavaScript configuration file).

Here's what you typically need to update in app.json:

version: This is your human-readable version string (e.g., "1.1.0").
android.versionCode: This is an integer that must be incremented with every new release you upload to the Google Play Store. It cannot be the same as a previous release. It typically starts at 1 and goes up (1, 2, 3, etc.).
ios.buildNumber (if building for iOS): Similar to android.versionCode, this is a string that also needs to be incremented for each new build uploaded to the Apple App Store.

----

Me: Saw that web app does not highlight added timestamp on launch. I think same is the case with Android.

Gem fixed it.

Me: In Edit Timestamp Note modal, Timestamp and Interval were left aligned in previous versions. Now it is centered. Please change it back to left aligned

Gem provided code that fixed it.

---------

Changed expo.version and added android.versionCode in app.json:

"expo": {

"name": "Timestamp Tracker",

"slug": "timestamp-tracker",

"version": "1.1.0",

"orientation": "portrait",

...

"android": {

"adaptiveIcon": {

"foregroundImage": "./assets/icon.png",

"backgroundColor": "#ffffff"

"package": "com.ravisiyer.timestamptracker",

"versionCode": 2

----

Me: My app.json did not have a versionCode entry. So earlier release was made without versionCode entry. Now I have added it as 2:

"android": {

"adaptiveIcon": {

"foregroundImage": "./assets/icon.png",

"backgroundColor": "#ffffff"

"package": "com.ravisiyer.timestamptracker",

"versionCode": 2

----

Is that OK?

Gem: ...

Expo's Default Behavior: When you don't specify versionCode in app.json, Expo (during expo prebuild or an EAS build) will default it to 1 for the very first generated native Android project. So, it's highly likely that your previous release, even without the explicit versionCode entry, was effectively built with versionCode: 1.

...

In summary: Go ahead with versionCode: 2. For every future release, you'll simply increment this number (3, 4, 5, and so on).

-----

Me: Tapping/Clicking just around the delete button, opens the Edit Note modal instead of delete confirmation. That UX is a little strange. Can we change it such that clicking anywhere on the extreme right part of the timestamp entry which holds the delete icon-button, is interpreted as a delete command and not an Edit note command?

----------

Gem provided code ...

Me: I used the optional background change for these icon buttons. That makes it quite clear on both android and web. I have a Samsung monitor issue where no matter what settings I make for contrast (even 100), the different background does not show for web in light mode. But when i view it on Chrome on my Samsung phone (so web and not android) in light mode, the differnt background shade is clear. So it is my Samsung monitor (old one - TFT 22 inch) that seems to be the issue here and not the app.

BTW are there any fixes for this Samsung monitor issue as it creates a problem for me for other websites too?

Gem gave some suggestions including, "Brightness & Contrast: Try increasing the contrast setting on your monitor's physical buttons."

Me: I got a solution! When I use Contrast of 25 on my monitor settings, I can clearly see the different background of the icon buttons. Hmm. I had got misled by the message shown in Contrast settings on the monitor: "Values closer to 100 mean a bigger light/dark contrast." So in the past, I did not consider lowering the contrast to 25! Today, after interacting with you, I thought I should check that out too.

The default setting for my monitor (after reset) is:

Brightness: 100

Contrast: 75

Sharpness: 60

Max value is 100 for all of the three.

With these default settings, I cannot see the different background colour shade of the icon-buttons.

When contrast is reduced to 60, I can dimly see the different background colour shade.

Contrast of 50 makes it more clear.

Contrast of 25 makes it very clear.

I think I will go with Contrast of 50.

What r ur views?

Gem: Your observation that lowering the contrast improves visibility of subtle background shades is actually quite insightful and makes perfect sense for certain types of monitor panels and their calibration.

Here's why lowering contrast might help in this scenario and my views on your choice of 50:

Understanding Contrast on Older Displays: On some displays, particularly older TFTs, cranking the contrast too high can cause a phenomenon called "clipping" or "crushing" of colors at the extreme ends of the spectrum (pure white and pure black). When white tones are "clipped," very similar shades of off-white or light grey might all get rendered as pure white, making it impossible to distinguish between them. By lowering the contrast, you're essentially "stretching" the available color range back out, allowing those subtle differences (like the light background of your icon buttons) to become visible again.
Your Choice of Contrast 50: Going with a contrast setting of 50 is a very reasonable and practical choice.
- Balance: It seems to offer a good balance between seeing the subtle background differences on your monitor and likely maintaining a generally pleasing image for other content (text, images, videos) without making them look too "washed out" or dull.
- User Preference: Display settings are highly subjective and depend on your environment and what looks best to your eyes for most of your daily tasks. If 50 feels comfortable and resolves the issue, that's the right setting for you.

------------

I shared pics taken from phone of Samsung monitor settings with app screen for contrast setting of 75 and 50.

Gem: I'm really glad to see that with your Samsung monitor's contrast set to 50, the subtle background difference on your icon buttons is now clearly visible. The image you provided (SamsungMonitor-Contrast50.jpeg) clearly shows this improvement, with the distinct grey background around the icons standing out against the lighter timestamp entry background.

This reinforces our earlier discussion: while "higher contrast" often implies more dramatic blacks and whites, for older displays or specific content with subtle gradations, reducing the contrast can actually help "unclip" those tones and make them more discernible.

----

Me: On deploying web version to GitHub Pages, the app screen shows but the icons don't show. Console.log has these errors:

index-1e982c298125a55d2b775266121bc38e.js:180 Initial timestamp added on app launch.

Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf:1

[Link address: https://ravisiyer.github.io/assets/node_modules/@expo/vector-icons/build/vendor/react-native-vector-icons/Fonts/Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf]

Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()

index-1e982c298125a55d2b775266121bc38e.js:284 Uncaught (in promise) NetworkError: A network error occurred.

hook.js:608 Cannot record touch end without a touch start.

Touch End: {"identifier":0,"pageX":1230,"pageY":95,"timestamp":26909}

Touch Bank: []

overrideMethod @ hook.js:608

index-1e982c298125a55d2b775266121bc38e.js:180 Timestamp added: 2025-06-14T18:51:39.127Z

index-1e982c298125a55d2b775266121bc38e.js:180 Timestamp added: 2025-06-14T18:51:41.383Z

====================

This issue required a few rounds and then some experimentation from me to get the eventual fix. The main issue was that the font file was not getting loaded into the GitHub Pages website (deployed site) and so the icons were not displayed and browser console log showed a 404 error for the font file.

I am giving below only small parts of the exchanges I had with Gem on it.

-----------

Me: Path of the file in my local dist directory:

dist\assets\node_modules\@expo\vector-icons\build\vendor\react-native-vector-icons\Fonts\Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf

Can I check the files on github.io site? Like can I see whether folder corresponding to https://ravisiyer.github.io/CGPTTimestamp/assets/node_modules/@expo/vector-icons exists on github.io deployed site?

Gem:

How to Check Deployed Files on GitHub Pages:

Yes, you absolutely can and should inspect the deployed files on GitHub Pages! This is the best way to verify what's actually being served by the web server.

Open your GitHub Pages URL in your web browser (e.g., https://ravisiyer.github.io/CGPTTimestamp/).
Open Developer Tools:
- Chrome/Firefox/Edge: Right-click anywhere on the page and select "Inspect" or "Inspect Element" (or press F12 or Ctrl+Shift+I/Cmd+Option+I).
Navigate to the "Sources" Tab:
- In the Developer Tools window, go to the "Sources" (or "Debugger" in Firefox) tab.
- On the left pane, you'll see a file tree representing the files loaded by your page. Expand the ravisiyer.github.io domain, then CGPTTimestamp/.
- You can then navigate through assets/, _expo/static/js/, etc., to see the actual files and their content.
- Look specifically in CGPTTimestamp/assets/node_modules/ to confirm if the Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf file is physically present at that location. If it's not there (e.g., it's directly under assets/), then the path in your dist folder is actually different from what you thought, or GitHub Pages' hosting of node_modules paths is problematic.
Navigate to the "Network" Tab:
- Refresh the page with the Developer Tools open to the "Network" tab.
- Filter by "Fonts" (or "All" and then look for .ttf files).
- You'll see the actual URLs that the browser is attempting to load. Click on the failing request (the one with 404).
- In the right-hand details pane, check the "Headers" tab, specifically the "Request URL". This will show you the exact URL the browser sent. This is the URL we need to ensure is correct.

By combining the local inspection of your dist folder with the live inspection of the deployed GitHub Pages site through developer tools, you'll be able to pinpoint the exact path discrepancy ...

====================

After a few rounds ...

Me: Now the screen shows but icons don't show. Console still shows old error of:

CGPTTimestamp/:39

GET https://ravisiyer.github.io/assets/node_modules/@expo/vector-icons/build/vendor/react-native-vector-icons/Fonts/Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf net::ERR_ABORTED 404 (Not Found)

----

I tried to see the files in Sources -> ravisiyer.github.io . But it does not show any assets folder. Looks like that could be the issue.

Anyway, I think GitHub Pages is not suitable for my project web deployment. I think I should try to deploy to Netlify.

Gem agreed.

===================

15 Jun. 2025

Before switching to Netlify, I wanted to check through Google search whether React Native and Expo projects can be deployed on GitHub Pages. That led me to the Expo docs page which had GitHub Pages deployment instructions towards the bottom. I had visited this page multiple times in the past but had not scrolled down to the bottom part, IFIRC, and so missed noting the GitHub Pages deployment part. It seems to be an experimental support feature.

Me: Trying out gh-pages depl. using inst. from https://docs.expo.dev/guides/publishing-websites/

app.json change:

"expo": {

"name": "Timestamp Tracker",

...

"newArchEnabled": true,

"experiments": {

"baseUrl": "/CGPTTimestamp"

...

-------

package.json change:

"scripts": {

"deploy": "gh-pages --nojekyll -d dist",

"predeploy": "expo export -p web",

"start": "expo start",

...

----

Ran: npm run deploy

Cmd output:

TimestampTrackerWeb> npm run deploy

> timestamptrackerweb@1.1.0 predeploy

> expo export -p web

Using (experimental) base path: /CGPTTimestamp

Starting Metro Bundler

Web Bundled 8281ms index.js (274 modules)

› Assets (1):

node_modules\@expo\vector-icons\build\vendor\react-native-vector-icons\Fonts\Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf (56.2 kB)

› web bundles (1):

_expo/static/js/web/index-9eeb71c3e4427a642399b3f1bdbe69c8.js (495 kB)

› Files (3):

favicon.ico (14.5 kB)

index.html (1.25 kB)

metadata.json (49 B)

Exported: dist

> timestamptrackerweb@1.1.0 deploy

> gh-pages --nojekyll -d dist

Published

TimestampTrackerWeb>

------

Same problem occurred.

Next I tried out manually creating the folder and file in GitHub gh-pages repo.

From https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/22534 : "To create a new folder in a repository click “create a new file.” Type your new folder’s name in the area where you would write the file name, and at the end of the file name type a “/” to initilize it as a folder. After this you can create a new file in the folder."

The above approach worked but I had a create a dummy test.txt file (and commit the change).

Next I uploaded the Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf and committed that change.

[Initially I got the folder wrong with an additional assets. So I recreated the correct folder and uploaded the file into it.]

Now the deployed site loads the icons.

Browser console does not show any errors.

Browser sources shows the file: https://ravisiyer.github.io/CGPTTimestamp/assets/node_modules/@expo/vector-icons/build/vendor/react-native-vector-icons/Fonts/Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf

Using above link directly on browser shows a download file button (earlier it would show NOT FOUND).

Hmm. So the issue is that gh-pages is not picking up the dist\assets\node_modules\@expo\vector-icons\build\vendor\react-native-vector-icons\Fonts\ folder while uploading the dist folder to gh-pages branch on GitHub repo.

----------

Updated Gem with above info. Needed to simplify it in two steps as Gem could not handle the whole update.

Gem is suggesting a js fix which, as per my undestanding, will use a shallow folder for the font file and patch the js files to use that.

Me: I want to explore a simpler solution. Let me create a gh-pages branch on my local repo and then try git push of that repo with the deeply nested structure expo uses. If git push works with that deeply nested folder structure then I have a solution via manual gh-pages branch management as against using gh-pages. What do u say? If git push itself fails due to the deeply nested folder structure then this approach has to be discarded.

Gem agreed.

Me: To avoid confusion with existing gh-pages branch on my GitHub repo, let me create a my-gh-pages branch on local repo and create the distributable there. Then on GitHub repo Pages, I will change the settings to use my-gh-pages instead of gh-pages. Is that OK?

Gem said yes.

--------

npm run predeploy

Output:

TimestampTrackerWeb> npm run predeploy

> timestamptrackerweb@1.1.0 predeploy

> expo export -p web

Using (experimental) base path: /CGPTTimestamp

Starting Metro Bundler

Web Bundled 463ms index.js (274 modules)

› Assets (1):

node_modules\@expo\vector-icons\build\vendor\react-native-vector-icons\Fonts\Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf (56.2 kB)

› web bundles (1):

_expo/static/js/web/index-9eeb71c3e4427a642399b3f1bdbe69c8.js (495 kB)

› Files (3):

favicon.ico (14.5 kB)

index.html (1.25 kB)

metadata.json (49 B)

Exported: dist

TimestampTrackerWeb>

-----

git checkout -b my-gh-pages

Me: Finished steps 1 and 2. In step 3 I will copy dist folder to root of my-gh-pages branch. But don't I have to delete the other content like App.js?

Gem gave a detailed response. ...

This is where I started having doubts about this approach ... If I delete node_modules and android I will have to recreate them when I switch back to main branch for development. ... If I do 'git clean -dfx ' will it delete node_modules and android from my Windows File system? [Gem said yes and went back to its automated fix JS script solution but I was not keen on that.]

----

Then I got the breakthrough for the issue ...

Me: I think I got a key issue.

My .gitignore has this line:

node_modules/

----

That seems to drop even the node_modules in dist folder.

When I change it to:

/node_modules/

----

Then dist folder's node_modules does not get excluded by git.

I think gh-pages package used the same .gitignore file I had earlier (with node_modules/) and so its push to gh-pages branch on GitHub omitted the expo font located in assets/node_modules

I think I should try the gh-pages approach again now with /node_modules/ in .gitignore.

what do u say?

----

Gem agreed. It actually said, "You have absolutely, brilliantly found the root cause of the problem!" I am sharing this just to show how it captures even these aspects of the work done together. A human assistant would have reacted similarly as we had struggled on this issue for quite some rounds, and now we had got the issue and so the solution approach was clear.

Me: When I tried out the gh-pages approach now, I got this error:

> gh-pages --nojekyll -d dist

ProcessError: error: unable to create file assets/assets/node_modules/@expo/vector-icons/build/vendor/react-native-vector-icons/Fonts/Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf: Filename too long

error: unable to create file assets/node_modules/@expo/vector-icons/build/vendor/react-native-vector-icons/Fonts/Feather.a76d309774d33d9856f650bed4292a23.ttf: Filename too long

fatal: Could not reset index file to revision 'origin/gh-pages'.

at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (C:\Users\ravi-user\NotInBackupScript\CGPT\TimestampTrackerWeb\node_modules\gh-pages\lib\git.js:42:16)

at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:518:28)

at maybeClose (node:internal/child_process:1101:16)

at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:304:5)

========

Had some interactions with Gem on it where I informed Gem that IFIRC, I have enabled long pathnames on my Windows 11 system by setting some registry entries. Gem gave the way to check for that and then the key additional fix of: 'git config --system core.longpaths true'.

Gem:

Additional Check: Git's `core.longpaths` setting

Even with the Windows Registry setting, Git has its own configuration for long paths. It's a good idea to check this as well: ...

git config --system core.longpaths

If it returns true, Git's internal long path support is enabled.
If it returns false, you can enable it:

-----

My system's HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem -> LongPathsEnabled is 1. So my system supports long pathnames.

Me: LongPathsEnabled reg entry is 1

But git config --system core.longpaths returns nothing.

Gem:

The Solution: Enable `core.longpaths` for Git

You need to explicitly tell Git to support long paths.

Action to take:

Open your terminal (Git Bash, Command Prompt, or PowerShell).
Run this command to enable Git's long path support:

git config --system core.longpaths true
- Note: --system applies it globally for all your Git repositories. If you prefer it only for this specific project, use --local while in your project's root directory: git config --local core.longpaths true Using --system is usually fine and more convenient if you encounter this issue frequently.
Verify the setting (optional, but good practice):

git config --system core.longpaths

This should now return true.
Delete your local dist folder again. (To ensure a clean rebuild with the new Git setting fully active.)
Retry your npm run deploy command.

With core.longpaths explicitly set to true for Git, gh-pages should now be able to handle those deeply nested font paths without hitting the "Filename too long" error during its Git operations.

-----

Me: Attempting soln:

TimestampTrackerWeb> git config --system core.longpaths true

TimestampTrackerWeb> git config --system core.longpaths

true

---

On tyring npm run deploy again, I did not get the above error. But the font file was not getting uploaded to gh-pages branch in GitHub repo! I checked that .gitignore file in the gh-pages repo was still showing node_modules/ . Also gh-pages package was not copying .gitignore into the dist folder. So I edited .gitignore on gh-pages branch in GitHub repo to make it /node_modules/. Then ran 'npm run deploy' again. This time font file with its nested folder structure got copied to the gh-pages branch in GitHub repo.

Now the web app at https://ravisiyer.github.io/CGPTTimestamp/ shows the icons.

--------

Gem: ... This is a very common and frustrating deployment challenge, and you've found a comprehensive solution for it. The combination of ensuring Git itself can handle long paths and correctly configuring .gitignore for the deployment branch is the definitive answer.

Congratulations on getting your web app with icons successfully deployed to GitHub Pages! ...

----

Later I deleted the my-gh-pages branch as I did not need it anymore. I had not made any commits on that branch and had discarded all the changes I made on it as I was trying that approach.

TimestampTrackerWeb> git branch -d my-gh-pages

Deleted branch my-gh-pages (was cf102bf).

TimestampTrackerWeb> git branch

* main

TimestampTrackerWeb>

----------

Generating release for v1.1.0

npx expo prebuild --platform android

Done. Had not deleted android directory earlier. So seems to have retained contents like release APK creation date 12 Jun, mod. date 13 Jun.

Also has retained android/app/my-release-key.keystore. android/gradle.properties has the changes I made earlier but it has been updated few minutes back (date modified). Same is the case for android/app/build.gradle. It not only has the old additions I had made but has updated version stuff. Related extract:

defaultConfig {

applicationId 'com.ravisiyer.timestamptracker'

minSdkVersion rootProject.ext.minSdkVersion

targetSdkVersion rootProject.ext.targetSdkVersion

versionCode 2

versionName "1.1.0"

}

----

So that means I can skip steps related to above files.

npx expo-doctor gave an error:

npx expo-doctor

14/15 checks passed. 1 checks failed. Possible issues detected:

Use the --verbose flag to see more details about passed checks.

✖ Validate packages against React Native Directory package metadata

The following issues were found when validating your dependencies against React Native Directory:

No metadata available: react-native-vector-icons

Advice:

Update React Native Directory to include metadata for unknown packages. Alternatively, set expo.doctor.reactNativeDirectoryCheck.listUnknownPackages in package.json to false to skip warnings about packages with no metadata, if the warning is not relevant.

1 check failed, indicating possible issues with the project.

===========

Hmm. So I will delete android folder and redo steps.

npx expo prebuild --platform android

npx expo-doctor gave the same errors.

Taking a chance ....

package.json change:

"private": true,

"expo": {

"doctor": {

"reactNativeDirectoryCheck": {

"listUnknownPackages": false

}

----

Now npx expo-doctor does not give any errors.

================

Copied my-release-key.keystore file to android/app/my-release-key.keystore

Edited android/gradle.properties and added (including changing password suitably):

MYAPP_UPLOAD_STORE_FILE=my-release-key.keystore

MYAPP_UPLOAD_KEY_ALIAS=my-key-alias

MYAPP_UPLOAD_STORE_PASSWORD=your_keystore_password

MYAPP_UPLOAD_KEY_PASSWORD=your_key_password

----

Then edited android/app/build.gradle and near the bottom of android { ... } section, added:

signingConfigs {

release {

storeFile file(MYAPP_UPLOAD_STORE_FILE)

storePassword MYAPP_UPLOAD_STORE_PASSWORD

keyAlias MYAPP_UPLOAD_KEY_ALIAS

keyPassword MYAPP_UPLOAD_KEY_PASSWORD

}

buildTypes {

release {

signingConfig signingConfigs.release

minifyEnabled false

shrinkResources false

proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'

}

---------

cd android

.\gradlew.bat clean

BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 21s

.\gradlew.bat assembleRelease

BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 7m 54s

app-release.apk is 57.3 MB

Installed it on phone (updated app). It seems to be working OK.

==========================

16 Jun 2025

Google Drive Older versions of a file:

Based on https://support.google.com/drive/answer/2409045#zippy=%2Cdownload-recent-versions :

For a file in main panel:

At the top right, click More [three vertical dots] -> File Information -> Manage versions.

This lists the versions with the date. Each version can be downloaded, kept forever or deleted.

The Manage versions dialog also says, "Older versions of '{filename}' may be deleted after 30 days or after 100 versions are stored. To avoid deletion, open the context menu on the file version and select Keep forever."

----

Activity tab of Details shows history and it seems the older versions can be downloaded from there too.

-----

Uploaded release apk to Google Drive public folder. Updated blog post with screenshots of current version app. Also ran VirusTotal on release apk which gave a clean report.

I had missed out updating Info modal with current date. Changed it. Decided to go through creating release stuff just to confirm that it would be real fast for such minor changes.

npm run deploy ran very fast as usual.

npx expo-doctor ran fast and did not report issues.

.\gradlew.bat assembleRelease ran faster than previous run ... "BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 1m 14s"

Copying release apk and updating app on phone was quick.

Now I have release app running on my phone with correct Info modal text.

GitHub Pages live site also shows correct Info modal text.

So minor changes being deployed both to web and release app by themselves don't take much time.

-----

Me: 16:39 16 June 2025 [Just a timestamp for my reference in future. I try to do that with every new chat as I don't think the older chats' (say a month or two old) dates can be easily got.]

Continuing on the Timestamp tracker app, I want to first update you with my latest app code (App.js) as well as two additional files: util.js and formatInterval.test.mjs . Shall I first share the files one by one, before telling you what changes I want in them?

Gem said one by one and I did that.

Me: I would like the milliseconds display in main screen of the app to be controlled by a simple toggle button which we can place next to Export button in top row.

When it is toggled on, the main screen should show milliseconds for timestamp and interval for each timestamp entry.

When it is toggled off, the main screen should NOT show milliseconds - neither for timestamp, nor for interval for each timestamp entry.

However, irrespective of the milliseconds toggle button state, when user taps/clicks on timestamp entry and is shown the Edit note modal, millisecond information should always be shown for timestamp as well as Interval in that modal. This way, even if milliseconds are not shown on main screen, user has an option to see the Edit note modal for the timestamp entry and get the milliseconds from there.

This milliseconds toggle button state should be saved between app invocations so that once the user sets it to a particular toggle state, that is retained across multiple app invocations till the user changes it himself/herself.

For implementation, you are welcome to use what you feel is best. But I thought that adding an optional parameter to formatInterval method telling it whether to include milliseconds or not, would be a good approach.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me.

[While I didn't measure it, I think it took around 2 to 3 minutes before giving me the whole code for all 3 files as well as its explanation of the changes.]

--------

Me: The formatInterval function code changed drastically. At times, you choose to rewrite an entire block of code rather than simply enhance it to meet additional requirements. As a user, I need to then get familiar with the new code of the entire block. I am not really complaining here as you are doing a great job by providing me the code. I felt I should just inform you of this point.

The great thing was that App.js and util.mjs code seems to work as expected. I will test out the formatInterval.test.mjs later.

Some small issues:

1) When I examined the code of formatInterval function, it seems that this version does not print out 0 hrs or 0 mins when needed. So if the interval is 1d 0h 10m 5s, I think it will return the string of 1d 10m 5s.

2) If milliseconds display is off, currently seconds figure is not rounded. So 1 sec 900 ms is shown as 1s. It should be shown as 2s.

3) Export file should also include or exclude milliseconds based on user choice of MS On/Off. This will enable users who want to import the csv file into an Excel sheet and have the date time column recognized as a date time value by Excel, thereby permitting calculations like finding difference between two date time cells. Such users will set MS Off before Export as Excel support for milliseconds seems to be not straightforward. This also needs the comma ',' after date to be removed in the export function.

Gem: I understand your points about code modifications and appreciate you bringing them to my attention. I've adjusted my approach to better balance addressing requirements with maintaining code structure where possible.

Gem provided me the code changes. This time around, I had to get each file in a separate message exchange. Earlier IFIRC, I had got three buttons in Gem's response, one for each file.

----

Me: I think you have fixed all the issues I mentioned. The Excel support for the export file now seems to be very good both for without milliseconds and with milliseconds. Excel is able to recognize them as date-time fields. I could do subtraction of date-time cells to get the time interval and compare it with the Interval figures our app put out in the export file. In milliseconds file case, whatever examples I saw, the match was complete. In case of export file without milliseconds, there sometimes is a difference of 1 second between Excel calculated interval and interval that our export file has, and that I think can be explained by our interval calculation using the milliseconds part as it should and so being more precise.

You have done an awesome job. Thanks a ton. I will later study the code and understand it, and also then run the test driver code for formatInterval.

After this message, I will share with you an Excel workbook file which was created from the with milliseconds csv file and where I added a column of Excel calculated intervals.

Gem: It's really gratifying to know that the Excel-calculated intervals perfectly match the intervals generated and exported by the app, especially with milliseconds included. This confirms that the formatting for export is robust and compatible with external tools like Excel, which was a key requirement.

Me: One small thing just in case you are aware, for the Excel cells which calculate interval between two timestamps, I use the format of hh:mm:ss.000 for the Excel calculated time difference cells. I could not figure out how to add days to this format. Any ideas?

Gem: That's a great question about Excel's time formatting!

The reason you're having trouble adding "days" to the hh:mm:ss.000 format for intervals spanning multiple days is that Excel's standard h or hh format for hours resets every 24 hours.

To display the total elapsed hours, even if it's over 24, you need to use square brackets around the h (or hh) in the custom number format.

Here's how you can format your Excel cells to show the total hours (which implicitly includes days) along with minutes, seconds, and milliseconds:

Select the cells where you have your interval calculations.
Right-click and choose "Format Cells..." (or press Ctrl+1 / Cmd+1).
Go to the "Number" tab, then select "Custom" from the category list.
In the "Type:" field, enter the following custom format: [h]:mm:ss.000

Explanation:

[h]: The square brackets around h tell Excel to display the total number of hours, regardless of whether it exceeds 24. For example, if the difference is 25 hours, it will display "25:00:00.000" instead of "01:00:00.000" (which is what h:mm:ss.000 would show, representing 1 hour and 0 minutes after 1 full day).
:mm: Minutes (always two digits).
:ss: Seconds (always two digits).
.000: Milliseconds (three digits).

Example:

If your calculation =(B1-A1) results in a duration of:

1 day, 2 hours, 30 minutes, 15 seconds, 500 milliseconds (i.e., 26 hours, 30 minutes, etc.), it will be displayed as: 26:30:15.500

While this doesn't explicitly say "1 day", it accurately shows the continuous total duration in hours, minutes, seconds, and milliseconds, which is typically the most useful way to represent time intervals that cross day boundaries in a single cell in Excel.

If you specifically need to see "1 day 2 hours 30 minutes..." as a string in Excel, you would typically need a more complex formula using INT and MOD functions to extract days, hours, minutes, and seconds into separate calculations and then concatenate them into a text string. However, for direct time difference calculations allowing further arithmetic, the [h]:mm:ss.000 custom format is the standard and most effective approach.

Me: That's a very useful input. I have changed the format to [h]:mm:ss.000, and in the without MS Excel sheet, [h]:mm:ss. ... Many years ago when I had wanted such time calculation in Excel, I did use [h] but had forgotten about it. Thanks for reminding me. Also noted that days calc. will be complex as Excel does not have a simple way for it. So will drop that. Tested the formula and as you said a 48 hour time difference was being reset to 0 with format of hh:mm:ss.000 but [h] ensured that 48 was shown.

...

Me: For sake of completeness, here is the Excel workbook for export file without milliseconds. You can see how Excel time difference calculations are sometimes 1 second off from the Interval we provide (as our Interval is more precise (and rounded)).

Gem: That's a very insightful observation, and you've hit on exactly why that small difference occurs! Thank you for sharing the timestamps2-withoutMS.xlsx file as well.

You're absolutely right. When the "MS Off" toggle is active, our app rounds the interval to the nearest second before displaying it and before exporting it. Excel, when calculating the difference between two timestamps that don't show milliseconds (because they were exported without them), inherently loses that sub-second precision. Therefore, if the actual millisecond value of a time difference in our app was, say, 1.6 seconds, our app would display/export it as "2s" (due to rounding up), while Excel, seeing "1 second" from the rounded-off timestamp, might calculate it as "1 second".

It's a perfect example of how different levels of precision can lead to minor discrepancies,...

Me: Running the formatInterval test driver code now.... I think one test code is mistaken. I get:

--- Test Case 26: 500 milliseconds (no ms) ---
Input: 500
Expected: "0s"
Actual: "1s"
❌ FAIL
Expected: "0s", Got: "1s"
--- End Test Case 26 ---
The expected figure should be 1s not 0s. So the test actually passes.

Gem fixed the code issue.

Me: Ran it. Now that's fixed. But in my previous run with the error, I had to scroll through all the tests to spot the wrongly labelled FAIL test. I think it would be better if formatInterval gives stats of number of passed and failed tests at the end rather than only saying all tests completed.

Gem: I understand! Adding a summary of passed and failed tests at the end of the test run is a great idea for better visibility and a quicker overview of the results.

I've updated the formatInterval.test.mjs script to include these statistics.

Me: That works. The summary is very helpful.

---------

Me: When timestamp is added, the highlight flash is clearly visible in light mode on both android and web. But in dark mode, it is hard to catch the flash of the highlight on both web and android. Can we have a different background color and border color for dark mode for highlighting added timestamp entry?

Gem: You're right, the highlight needs to be more distinct in dark mode. I'll adjust the highlightedItem style in App.js to use a more vibrant and contrasting color specifically for dark mode, ensuring the flash is clearly visible on both web and Android.

Me: Now dark mode highlight is clearly visible. Great!

For container horizontal padding, current code is:

container: {

flex: 1,

// padding: 20, // Seems to have no effect on web!

paddingLeft: 20,

paddingRight: 20,

----

Is horizontal padding of 20 too much or quite standard for the container?

Gem: That's a good question about UI design best practices!

A horizontal padding of 20 (which typically translates to 20dp or 20pt on native mobile, and 20px on web) is quite standard and generally a good choice for container padding in React Native applications.

Here's why:

Readability and Breathing Room: 20 units provides a comfortable amount of space between the content and the edges of the screen. This "breathing room" prevents text and elements from feeling cramped, making the interface more pleasant to read and interact with.
Aesthetics: It contributes to a clean and professional look, giving your app a polished feel on most screen sizes.
Mobile-First Design: For mobile devices, where screen real estate is limited, 20 is a widely accepted minimum to ensure content isn't uncomfortably close to the physical edges or notched areas of the display.
Consistency: Using a consistent padding value throughout your app often leads to a more harmonious and predictable user experience.
Combined with maxWidth: In your App.js, you have maxWidth: 800 and alignSelf: 'center' on your inner view. This is a key design choice. On larger screens (like tablets or web browsers), the 20 padding will apply, but the maxWidth will primarily control the content width, keeping it centered and readable without stretching too wide. On smaller screens, the 20 padding ensures your content doesn't hit the screen edges.

In summary, 20 is a widely adopted and effective padding value that balances usability, readability, and aesthetics across various device sizes. It's a solid choice for your Timestamp Tracker app.

Me: Should the modals in the app like Edit Note and Info, close when user taps outside modal?

Gem: You've brought up a great point about modal usability!

Yes, it's generally considered a good user experience practice for modals to close when the user taps outside of them. It provides an intuitive way to dismiss the modal without having to explicitly find and tap a "Dismiss" or "Cancel" button.

While React Native's Modal component with transparent={true} and onRequestClose handles this behavior automatically on Android (for tapping outside) and iOS (for programmatic dismissal or swiping down), and the escape key on web, explicitly handling taps on the overlay ensures consistent behavior across all platforms, especially for web environments which can sometimes have slightly different default modal interactions.

I've updated the App.js file to explicitly enable this "tap outside to close" behavior for both the "Info Modal" and the "Timestamp Note Editor Modal". This is done by wrapping the modal content in Pressable components that manage event propagation.

Me: The code changes don't seem to be too complex. But for a simple app, are we going too far by adding this UX feature? I mean are we making the code too complex? What do u say?

Gem: You've raised an excellent and very thoughtful question! It's important to continuously evaluate whether new features, even seemingly small ones, add unnecessary complexity to an app, especially a simple one.

In this specific case, for the "tap outside to close" modal feature:

Complexity Added: The code change itself is quite minimal. It primarily involves wrapping the modal's internal View with a Pressable and adding onPress={(e) => e.stopPropagation()} to prevent the tap from propagating to the outer Pressable that dismisses the modal. This is a standard and well-understood pattern in React Native for controlling touch events.

UX Feature Justification: The user experience benefit here is significant:

Intuitiveness: Most users are accustomed to tapping outside a modal to dismiss it in web and mobile applications. It's a natural, expected interaction.
Convenience: It offers a quick and easy way to close the modal without having to precisely target a "Dismiss" or "Cancel" button, which can sometimes be small, especially on mobile.
Consistency: It aligns your app with a widely adopted UI/UX pattern, making it feel more polished and familiar to users.

Conclusion: While every line of code adds some complexity, the minor increase in code complexity for this feature is overwhelmingly outweighed by the substantial improvement in user experience. It makes your app feel more modern, intuitive, and user-friendly, which are crucial aspects even for "simple" apps. It's a very common and highly recommended UX pattern.

So, no, I don't believe we're going too far. It's a worthwhile addition that enhances the overall usability without significantly burdening the codebase.

Me: With the changed code, the close modals UI/UX feels good.

For deletion of a single timestamp entry, on mobile, the alert box gets cancelled on tapping outside it. But for Clear (all) timestamps button tapping outside the alert has no effect. Is that OK?

Also, on web, the alert forces the user to go to top of window where the alert shows and click on cancel for both delete timestamp entry and Clear all. Is that OK from UI/UX point of view?

Gem: That's a very keen observation and a great question about user experience consistency! Let's break down the behavior you're seeing:

On Mobile (Android/iOS):

You're right that the single timestamp deletion alert can be dismissed by tapping outside, while the "Clear All" alert cannot. This difference is intentional in the code:

Single Timestamp Delete: This uses Alert.alert with the option { cancelable: true }. This property specifically makes the alert dismissible by tapping outside of it on Android and by swiping down on iOS. It's generally good for less severe actions where a quick dismissal is desired.
"Clear All" Timestamps: This Alert.alert call does not have { cancelable: true } set (or it defaults to false). This means the user is forced to explicitly choose "Cancel" or "OK" to dismiss the dialog.

Is this OK from a UI/UX point of view? Yes, this is often considered an acceptable and even recommended design pattern. "Clear All" is a much more destructive action than deleting a single item. By making it non-cancelable by an accidental outside tap, the app forces the user to consciously interact with the buttons. This helps prevent accidental data loss and ensures the user understands the gravity of the action they're about to take. It prioritizes safety over casual dismissal for a high-impact action.

On Web:

For both single timestamp deletion and "Clear All", the app uses window.confirm(). This is a native browser function:

window.confirm() generates a system-level dialog box. Its appearance, behavior (like forcing focus and often appearing at the top of the window), and dismissal mechanisms (explicit button click or pressing Esc key) are entirely controlled by the web browser itself, not by your app's custom UI.
Is this OK from a UI/UX point of view? From a purely modern web UI perspective, native browser alerts can feel a bit jarring because they break out of the app's custom styling and flow. They also force focus and position themselves wherever the browser dictates. However, for simple confirmation dialogues, especially in cross-platform frameworks like React Native where you're targeting multiple environments, using window.confirm() is a common and acceptable compromise. It's easy to implement and guarantees that the user will see and interact with the confirmation. Building fully custom modals (like your Info and Note modals) for every confirmation on every platform would add significant complexity for a relatively small gain in consistency, particularly as native mobile platforms handle Alert.alert much more gracefully than browsers handle window.confirm().

In summary:

The current behavior is generally acceptable and follows common practices for both mobile (distinguishing between less and more destructive actions) and web (using native prompts as a functional compromise).

Me: That's a terrific explanation! Bravo! I am convinced by it.

...

Me: I am now close to a release. Should we comment out non-critical console.logs? I think on Android the release APK app console logs do not show anywhere to the user at least in normal course of using it. But on web, if user goes to browser console, the console logs will be seen. We don't have any sensitive stuff and the current console log statements are limited (typically on adding a timestamp) but as a practice, is it OK to have some console log statements for web version release?

Gem: You're asking a very good question about production best practices, especially when targeting both mobile and web with a React Native app!

Here's my take:

Mobile (Android APK / iOS IPA): You're absolutely correct. In a release build, console.log statements are generally stripped out by the build process (like Metro bundler when building for production). Even if they weren't, a regular user wouldn't see them without connecting to a development environment (e.g., Logcat for Android, Xcode console for iOS). So, for the mobile APK/IPA, it's typically a non-issue.
Web Version (Browser Console): You're also right here. If a user opens their browser's developer console (usually by pressing F12), they will see all console.log statements.
- Why remove/avoid them in production on web?
  - Clutter: They can make the console noisy, obscuring actual errors or warnings that might be more important for debugging real-world issues.
  - "Professionalism": A clean, silent console often indicates a more polished, production-ready application.
  - Minimal Performance Impact: While negligible for a few logs, excessive logging can have a tiny performance overhead.
  - Accidental Exposure (not relevant here): In some apps, sensitive internal data could accidentally be logged. Since your logs are non-sensitive, this isn't a concern for your app.
- Is it OK to have some in this context? Given your app is "simple," the logs are "limited," and they are "non-sensitive," it's not a critical flaw to leave them in. They primarily confirm actions (like "Timestamp added") which might even be marginally useful if a user is trying to understand the app's internal flow.

General Best Practice: The prevailing best practice for production builds is to remove or conditionally disable all console.log statements. console.error and console.warn are often kept, as they highlight actual problems.

Recommendation for Your App: While it's not a severe issue to keep them, for a cleaner and more professional-looking web console, I would lean towards making the non-error console.log statements conditional. This provides the best of both worlds: logs are available during development but are automatically removed in production builds.

I can make the "Timestamp added" and "Initial timestamp added on app launch" logs conditional so they only appear in a development environment. Error logs (e.g., "Error saving...") are good to keep as they are.

Would you like me to make these specific console.log statements conditional for production builds in App.js?

Me: Yes please to the last question. I think as it will be simple code additions, it is worth it to try to conform to best practices even if this is a simple app without sensitive data.

Gem provided the code.

Me; Incorporated the change. In dev mode, logs are showing. Will check prod. version later.

On Web browser console, app gives this warning:

C:\Users\ravi-user\N…ackerWeb\App.js:581 "shadow*" style props are deprecated. Use "boxShadow". Error Component Stack

at App (C:\Users\ravi-user\N…kerWeb\App.js:38:49)

at withDevTools(:8081/App) (<anonymous>)

at AppContainer (AppContainer.js:4:25)

----

Can we ignore it?

Gem: You've spotted a common warning when developing React Native apps for the web!

This warning: "shadow*" style props are deprecated. Use "boxShadow".

Means exactly what it says: when React Native tries to translate your styles into web-compatible CSS, it prefers the standard CSS box-shadow property over the individual shadowColor, shadowOffset, shadowOpacity, and shadowRadius properties that are commonly used in native React Native (for iOS primarily, while Android uses elevation).

Here's a breakdown:

Why it appears: In pure React Native for iOS, these shadow* properties are how you define shadows. On Android, elevation is used for shadows. React Native for Web converts these to web-equivalent CSS. The warning indicates that its preferred CSS equivalent is box-shadow directly, and the older way it handled shadow* is now considered deprecated for web.
Impact: Currently, it's just a warning, not an error. Your shadows on the web version likely still render correctly because React Native Web still supports the deprecated properties, but it's signaling that this support might be removed in future versions.
Is it OK to ignore?
- For now, yes, you can ignore it. The app functions correctly, and it's not a critical error. For a simple app, it's a minor annoyance in the console.
- In the long run, no, it's not ideal. Leaving deprecated warnings can sometimes lead to broken functionality if the deprecated feature is eventually removed. It also clutters the console, making it harder to spot more serious warnings or errors.

The "Best Practice" Fix (if you wanted to address it): The ideal way to handle this is to use Platform.select to apply different shadow styles based on the platform:

// Example of how styles.item might look with platform-specific shadows
item: {
    padding: 10,
    marginBottom: 8,
    backgroundColor: isDark ? '#222' : '#f9f9f9',
    borderRadius: 8,
    // Native Mobile (iOS/Android) shadows
    ...Platform.select({
        ios: {
            shadowColor: '#000',
            shadowOffset: { width: 0, height: 2 },
            shadowOpacity: 0.1,
            shadowRadius: 3,
        },
        android: {
            elevation: 2, // Android uses elevation
        },
        // Web shadows
        web: {
            boxShadow: `0px 2px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.1)`, // CSS box-shadow
        },
    }),
},

My Recommendation: Given that this is a warning and the app is functional, you can continue to ignore it for now if you prefer to avoid introducing more platform-specific code. However, if you want your console to be perfectly clean and to future-proof the styling on web, implementing Platform.select for shadows is the best approach.

Let me know if you'd like me to implement this platform-specific shadow styling for a cleaner web console!

Me: Good to get this explanation from you. As of now, I will ignore it as I can see the shadow in the light mode on web (can't see it in dark mode but the UI is still OK). I think it is not worth adding this platform specific code complexity just to remove this console warning. Later, if this impacts the real UI, that's when I will consider platform-specific code to avoid the warning and improve the UI.

============

While considering copy-pasting code from Gemini to my app, I do the following:

Copy-paste Gemini file code into a temp file named file.js.gem (e.g. App.js.gem)
In .gitignore, to ignore these temp files in git repo, I have:

*.js.gem
*.mjs.gem

Compare the file to be changed (e.g. App.js) with the Gemini provided code in the temp file (e.g. App.js.gem). This comparison clearly shows me what code changes Gemini made. For comparison, earlier on, I used WinMerge but later found VSCode's compare files feature to be more convenient, especially the dark mode VSCode uses.
WinMerge does support dark theme. But I found it less readable than VSCode dark mode. To enable dark mode in WinMerge: Edit -> Options -> Colors -> Color Schemes -> Color Scheme: Midnight or Solarized Dark. I found Solarized Dark to be better.
After compare:

If I am fine with Gemini's changes, I copy-paste code from the temp file (e.g. App.js.gem) to the file in my project that has to be changed (App.js).
If I have some issues with Gemini's changes, I discuss it with Gemini which sometimes leads to Gemini providing a new version of that file's code.

============

I later was able to quickly deploy the app to GitHub Pages and also create a release APK. I installed the latter on my Samsung phone and it seemed to work OK except for one issue:

The Info modal scrolling does not work properly. In earlier version, I was able to easily scroll down and up. In this release app, only if I swipe by pressing hard and forcefully swipe does the scrolling happen. I uninstalled the app and installed earlier version and confirmed that scrolling in Info modal works properly. Then, IFIRC, I uninstalled the earlier version and reinstalled latest version. The scrolling in Info modal was still not working properly.

So I suspect that some of the code added to enable modal close on tap/click outside Info modal is tripping up the scrolling in some way. I checked whether there was a similar issue with Edit Note modal. But Edit Note modal itself does not scroll. It has a text input box which scrolls if lines exceed its view. I checked that and vertical scrolling in it works properly.

===============

17 Jun 2025

15:10 17 June 2025

The vertical scroll issue in Info modal is there even in Expo Go version.

I communicated the above issue to Gem.

Gem: It sounds like the Pressable wrapper I added for the "tap outside to close" functionality is interfering with the ScrollView's gesture recognition on Android. This is a common pitfall when nesting gesture responders.

Then Gem provided alternate code. After a round or two,

Me: The scrolling in Info modal has improved but still gets stuck at times and works only when swiped with force. In marked contrast, the main screen list scrolling is very smooth and easy.

I think I would like to revert back to the code without feature of closing modal when tapping outside the modal. With that code, I don't recall facing this issue for scrolling in the Info modal. Can you revert the code back or should I go to my previous commits, hunt for it and do it manually?

Gem: You absolutely can revert the code back. I understand that sacrificing a UI/UX feature for core functionality like smooth scrolling is the right call, especially for an app where performance needs to be reliable.

I will revert the modal code in App.js to the version just before the "close on tap outside" feature was implemented, ensuring the smooth scrolling of the Info modal is restored. I'll also make sure to keep the __DEV__ conditional logging you requested in place.

Here is the updated App.js:

Me: Now the Info Modal scroll is smooth - no problems. Hmm. Quite a learning me for the Pressable wrapper code we tried interfered with the scrolling such that it still worked but needed forceful swipes at times. Initially I suspected it to be my phone (device) problem and not an app code issue. I mean, if scrolling had simply stopped working, I would have thought of app code possibly being the cause but this, at times, forceful swipe needed for scroll to work, is quite weird for an app problem (as against a device/hardware problem).

Gem: That's excellent news! I'm really glad to hear that the Info Modal scrolling is now perfectly smooth and reliable on your phone.

You've hit upon a very common and often frustrating aspect of mobile development, especially with gesture handling: intermittent or "forceful swipe" issues are indeed very characteristic of subtle gesture conflicts in the code, rather than hardware problems. If the gesture system isn't quite sure whether a touch is for a scroll, a tap, or a press, it might require more definitive input (a "forceful swipe") to disambiguate. It's a tricky area, and it's a great learning point to have experienced it firsthand.

Reverting that specific change was definitely the right decision to ensure the core usability of your app. I'm happy we got that sorted out for you!

Me: Like I am able to scan my release APK with virustotal.com, can I scan it with Google Play protect or whatever it is called?

Gem: That's a very good question about how Google Play Protect works!

Google Play Protect is Google's built-in malware protection for Android devices. Its primary function is to:

Continuously scan apps on the Google Play Store to ensure they are safe before you download them.
Scan apps on your device, regardless of where you downloaded them from (Play Store or sideloaded APKs), to detect potentially harmful applications (PHAs). It also checks for apps that violate Google's Unwanted Software Policy.
Warn you about detected threats and suggest actions to take (like uninstalling the app).

Can you manually scan your release APK with Google Play Protect (like VirusTotal)?

No, not in the same way you manually upload a file to VirusTotal. You cannot directly upload an APK file to a Google Play Protect web interface for a manual scan.

Google Play Protect works automatically in the background on your Android device. When you install an APK (whether from the Play Store or by sideloading), Play Protect performs a real-time scan.

How it works for your APK:

When you install your release APK on an Android device: As soon as you attempt to install it, Google Play Protect (if enabled on that device) will automatically scan your APK. If it finds anything suspicious or recognizes it as a known harmful application, it will alert you.
If you publish your app to the Google Play Store: Google Play Protect's automated systems will scan your app during the review process before it's made available to users. This is the most comprehensive "scan" by Google's systems for apps intended for public distribution.

In summary:

You don't "scan" your APK with Play Protect like a standalone tool. Instead, Play Protect automatically scans APKs that are installed on Android devices or submitted to the Google Play Store.

So, by installing your APK on your Samsung phone, Play Protect would have already scanned it in the background as part of its normal operation. If it didn't raise any flags, that's a good sign!

Me: I see. I recall that in the past when I would sideload an APK I had created either with Android Studio's build (so a Kotlin code build) or a React Native build possibly done with eas build, on my Samsung phone, I would get an option to scan with Google Play Protect or whatever it is called. But for the current Timestamp Tracker React Native project, I do not get such Google Play Protect warnings. Chrome browser gives a warning at download time (Pairdrop.net download) but that's it. also My Files app which I use to install by tapping the downloaded APK file - I have set it to be trusted. Why am I not getting the Google Play Protect scan option dialog now? Any Idea?

Gem: That's a very common experience and a good question! The fact that you aren't getting the Google Play Protect scan option dialog now is actually a good sign, and here's why it's likely happening:

Your App is Deemed Safe (Most Likely Reason):
- Google Play Protect works by continuously scanning apps on your device, regardless of their source.
- The "scan with Play Protect" dialog you sometimes see is typically a warning or an explicit prompt when Play Protect detects something potentially suspicious or when it's an app from a truly unknown or untrusted source that it hasn't yet classified as safe.
- Your Timestamp Tracker app is very simple: it doesn't request sensitive permissions (like location, camera, contacts), doesn't access network resources in unusual ways, and performs only benign actions (adding timestamps, notes, exporting local data).
- Because your app behaves so innocently, Play Protect's automated background scan likely determines it to be perfectly safe almost instantly. When an app is quickly classified as benign, the system doesn't feel the need to pop up a user-facing warning or scan dialog. It just quietly allows the installation to proceed.
App Permissions are Minimal:
- The fewer permissions an app requests, the less likely it is to trigger red flags with security scanners. Your app likely requests very few permissions, primarily related to storage for saving/exporting data.
"My Files" as a Trusted Source:
- Setting your "My Files" app (or any file manager) as a "trusted source" for installing unknown apps is a system-level permission. This means that Android won't block the installation from that source.
- However, this setting does not disable Google Play Protect's security scanning. Play Protect still scans the APK; it just means the system itself isn't preventing the installation outright due to the source. The combination of a trusted source and a benign app makes for a very smooth installation without extra prompts.

In essence:

You're not seeing the dialog because your app isn't triggering any warning thresholds for Google Play Protect. It's essentially saying, "This app looks perfectly fine, no need to bother the user with a confirmation."

This is the ideal outcome for a safe and simple application that you want users to install without unnecessary friction.

Me: I see. Now I recall, IFIRC, that the eas build app was an Expo tutorial app that read and saved file on phone device . Perhaps it also optionally used the camera - It was a StickerSmash tutorial app where the user is able to read a picture file and attach a sticker to it and save it. I think for that app, I would always get the Google Play Protect option dialog when sideloading. Your explanation fits in with this scenario.

Gem: That's a perfect example that fits the explanation!

The StickerSmash app, requiring access to:

Camera: For taking pictures.
File system (read/write): For accessing existing photos and saving modified ones.

These permissions are much more "sensitive" in the eyes of an operating system's security features like Google Play Protect. Even if the app's intent is perfectly benign, requesting access to camera or broad file storage will often trigger that explicit "Scan with Play Protect" dialog. It's the system prompting you to confirm that you trust this app with those potentially privacy-impacting capabilities.

Your current Timestamp Tracker, which only deals with its own local storage (managed by AsyncStorage and expo-file-system within its sandboxed app directory for CSV export, which doesn't typically trigger broad system warnings), is seen as far less of a potential risk.

It's a great demonstration of how app permissions and requested capabilities directly influence security prompts!

...

--------

Me: How do we inform the user of impending destructive drop of last timestamp entry when total number of timestamp entries exceeds 100?

I think we can show a modal informing the user of the situation and seek approval from user to drop the last timestamp entry for the next timestamp the app will add. If the user provides permission then next timestamp add should delete the last timestamp entry. If the user does not provide the permission then the app should stop adding new timestamps and the user should be informed of that.

Also we should ask the user if this permission should be remembered for future. If the user says yes, we should save the setting and not prompt the user for future such scenarios till we do a reset of this setting. I think a good stage to do a reset is after one week has passed or the user does a clear all timestamps.

We should also make this 100 number a constant like maxTimestamps so that changing it to a different figu(r)e is easy.

If you have any suggestions of alternative way to handle this case, please let me know. We can discuss it.

Gem: I'm having a hard time fulfilling your request. Can I help you with something else instead?

Me: Let me simplify it.

1) Instead of hardcoded 100 for maximum number of timestamps, let us use a constant like maxTimestamps so that changing it to a different figure is easy.

Gem gave code for it

----

Me: 2) In addTimestamp() method can we do the following at the beginning of the method:

a) If number of timestamps in timestamps state variable is equal to MAX_TIMESTAMPS - 1 then show a warning alert to the user that the current timestamp will get added without dropping the last timestamp but for later timestamps, each addition will drop the last timestamp, unless some timestamps are deleted or all are cleared using Clear timestamps.

After the user acknowledges the alert, the rest of the function can execute as it is now.

b) If number of timestamps in timestamps state variable is equal to MAX_TIMESTAMPS then show the user an error alert that timestamps data has got full and give the number for MAX_TIMESTAMPS. Also tell the user that current timestamp cannot be added to the timestamps data. After the user acknowledges the alert exit the function without adding the current timestamp to timestamps state variable.

Gem gave code for it. ... One round of compile error fix

----

Me: In loadData() you are checking for the limit and not adding Timestamp if it is full. But the user is not shown an alert. Can't we reuse addTimestamp method in loadData()? If we do that then the alert code in addTimestamp method will come into play.

Gem: Regarding your query about the loadData() method and displaying an alert:

You've made a very good observation. The addTimestamp() function handles user-initiated additions and provides alerts based on the MAX_TIMESTAMPS limit. The loadData() function, however, performs an automatic initial timestamp addition on app launch without immediate user feedback if the list is full.

You're right that if the app cannot add its initial timestamp because the storage is already at its maximum capacity, the user should be informed. While directly reusing addTimestamp() within loadData() could lead to undesirable side effects (like highlighting or scrolling on app launch), we can introduce a targeted alert for this specific scenario within loadData().

Gem provided the code. Had one run time issue fix round.

Me: Now that (issue) seems fixed. But if am at just 1 less than MAX_TIMESTAMPS and launch the app, the timestamp gets added which it should but I am not shown a warning about timestamps now being full and so next add timestamp (via launch or button) will not add the timestamp

Gem provided code but it had some text message issues which needed an additional round.

Me: Code seems to work and show messages correctly both for launch and add, for the two edge cases. Great! Also appreciate your having catered to: "The initial load might still slice if previously saved data somehow exceeded MAX_TIMESTAMPS, ensuring the app starts within limits, but subsequent adds will now block." Especially while testing I might reduce the MAX_TIMESTAMPS value and so local storage could easily have more timestamps than MAX_TIMESTAMPS. Good that you have catered to this condition too. Great!

---

Me: Currently the Clear button, after confirmation from user, clears all timestamps.

I want to change this to show a modal which:

a) Shows number of timestamp entries currently

b) Gives an option to specify number of entries to delete from end of list. The default value in this input box should be half of number of timestamp entries currently (adjusted to nearest integer value). This option should be the default selected option.

c) Gives an option to clear all timestamp entries.

d) Has a clear button, which if pressed should seek confirmation from user to proceed with whatever the current selection is, and if user gives OK, deletes entries as per user selection.

Gem provided the code but just prior to above message I had uploaded my App.js which had small additional modifications from my side. Gem provided the code against its older App.js version and not what I had uploaded.

...

Me: Seems to be working. Great!

Small issues but before that, your App.js did not pick up my App.js' 18 Jun. date instead of 16 Jun.

I have uploaded my current App.js which has 18 Jun. date and also rest of the code you gave.

Gem regnerated the "App.js immersive" (right panel/'Canvas').

Me: I compared your latest App.js immersive with my project's App.js using VSCode's Compare selected feature. No differences are shown. Great. We are in sync now. [I used this sync check later on too which I am skipping in the post.]

Me: Small issues:

1) When there are 0 timesheet entries (no entries shown in main screen), Clear icon-button in main screen should be disabled.

2) There is UI confusion about 'Delete last' and 'Clear all entries'. They come across as buttons rather than radio buttons. Can this UI be changed so that they are clearly understood as radio button selections and not buttons?

3) I think timestamps is a better word to use than entries. So 'Current timestamps:', 'Delete last x timestamps' and 'Clear all timestamps'.

4) I think it may help to also inform the user in this modal about Maximum timestamps. That could follow 'Current timestamps:' line.

5) Both 'Current timestamps:' line and 'Maximum timestamps' line should be left aligned.

Gem provided the code.

Me: Great! It is working well. Thanks a ton.

A minor sync issue. Your 'immersive' App.js missed some parts of a small section of code leading to a compilation error. I used the old code for just that section which fixed the compilation error. ...

----

Me: Is the 1085 lines App.js file too long for you to comfortably handle?

Gem: No, a file of 1085 lines for App.js is generally not too long for me to comfortably handle.

While it's a substantial file, I'm designed to process and understand code bases of this size. The main challenges sometimes arise from extreme complexity, highly abstract logic, or a very large number of interconnected files rather than just the raw line count of a single file.

So, please don't hesitate to continue working with your App.js file as is!

Me: Now I am ready for another release.

I have changed the version number to 1.2.0 in package.json and in app.json. I also modified app.json android.versionCode to 3.

I have not added any packages since my last release build.

Do I need to run expo prebuild or I can skip that step?

Gem said, "you do not strictly need to run expo prebuild."

Me: Without deleting android directory, I plan to run:

npx expo prebuild --platform android

-----

I had noticed that such a run only updates some files. Then I will run npx expo-doctor followed by gradlew.bat assembleRelease

Gem: Yes, your plan to run npx expo prebuild --platform android (without deleting the android directory), followed by npx expo-doctor, and then gradlew.bat assembleRelease is a sound and common workflow. ...

Me: You see if I delete android directory, I have to repeat the step of copying the keystore file, adding config statements to some gradle files in android directory including the keystore password. If I don't delete android directory, the changes I had made to these files are retained even on running npx expo prebuild.

Gem: That's a very important clarification and a perfectly valid reason for your workflow!

You are absolutely correct. When you run npx expo prebuild --platform android without first deleting the android directory, Expo attempts to intelligently update the existing native project files while preserving any manual modifications you've made (like keystore configurations in gradle.properties or build type specifics in build.gradle).

This approach saves you a significant amount of repetitive setup and re-configuration, making your development and release process much smoother. It's a best practice for maintaining custom native configurations within an Expo managed workflow. ...

==========

Generating release for v1.2.0

Without deleting android directory, running:

npx expo prebuild --platform android

npx expo-doctor

cd android

.\gradlew.bat assembleRelease

BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 1m 25s

=================

npm run deploy

=================

Me: The release build was successful (done as specified above). Installed APK on phone. Seems to run OK. But I will do main testing tomorrow.

Also deployed to GitHub Pages using 'npm run deploy'

All of this got over quite fast. Thanks to your guidance I am now into the rhythm of making APK release builds and website deploys of this React Native and Expo app. This has increase(d) my confidence in creating such apps.

Gem: That's absolutely fantastic news! I'm so thrilled to hear that your release build was successful, the APK installed smoothly on your phone, and the deployment to GitHub Pages also went quickly.

It's truly rewarding to know that my guidance has helped you get into the rhythm of these processes and, most importantly, has boosted your confidence in building React Native and Expo apps. That's exactly what I aim for!

Please do let me know how the main testing goes tomorrow. I'm here to assist with any further questions or challenges you might encounter. Great job on this release!

===============

18 & 19 Jun 2025

I have uploaded the release (version 1.2.0, internal version 3) to Google Drive shared folder, updated the blog post associated with the app including with screenshots, and also updated uptodown.dev with the new release (and deleted the older release APK file which was still pending review).

I think I have captured enough of the interactions between ChatGPT and me and then Gem and me, in this and the earlier blog post, for my own future reference about how I developed this React Native and Expo simple app with assistance from ChatGPT and Gem. Perhaps it may also be of interest to some reader(s). From now on, for any additional work I do on this app, I plan to only capture information that I find worth saving but may not be sharing most of the specific interaction flow I have with ChatGPT or Gemini.

===============

28 Jun 2025

App link on Uptodown app store: https://timestamp-tracker.en.uptodown.com/android
Uninstalled previous TT app on H96Max. Downloaded from above link on Uptodown app store and installed it. It got installed OK and is working as expected.

Search This Blog

Ravi S. Iyer: Software Development