Notes about Google Antigravity used in Google AI Pro plan; Jules vs Antigravity

This post is related to my recent previous posts:
20:03, 24 February 2026


Learn the basics of Google Antigravity ~14 mins by Google Antigravity, Nov. 2025



Welcome to Google Antigravity ~2 mins, Nov. 2025

  • Has a free plan
  • Recommended plan is "Developer plan via Google One" - "Leverage Antigravity as your daily driver via your Google AI Pro or Ultra subscription."
So looks like my Google AI Pro plan will provide me Developer plan!

I am downloading Antigravity for Windows x64 - 166 MB download. 
20:42, 24 February 2026 Had to resume download (switched to Jio from Airtel before resume). The download picked up from where it had stopped (around 40+ MB).
It got completed in few minutes after resume.

Before install C drive: 29.8 GB free

Install says: At least 791.9 MB of free disk space is required.
Install processing work took around 2 to 3 mins.

App start took long. Windows Firewall popup had to be given Allow - that took time.
Finally Antigravity setup process UI...
  • Chose import settings from VSCode, Dark mode
  • Going with default "Review-driven development" (recommended). Later may try out "Agent-driven development"
  • Went with some other defaults
Am shown option to open ssw-astro and other recent "workspaces". Chose ssw-astro
It opened the ssw-astro project. The UI is similar to VSCode but instead of CoPilot, the Agent seems to be Antigravity.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) is the selected model. Claude Sonnet and Opus 4.6 are also provided as options!

C drive free space after install is 29.0 GB.

I am trying out this prompt:
The app contains a Support page. I want to remove it. Also footer and any other menu links to Support page should be removed.
------
Took time. ... Approved one step.
For next step of: Removing references to support page from menu.ts, deleting support.astro, and inspecting globals.css.
  • Faced my first agent crash.
  • But it had made the changes correctly.
Next prompt I gave:
The code changes for removing support page are done. Can you test whether the app is working correctly?

It did the testing (opening browser, loading site ... and generated a recording of the test). It said: "I have successfully tested the application locally to verify the Support page removal. I used a browser agent to check the app and confirmed that it renders correctly. The Support link is no longer present in the navigation menu or footer, and basic routing is working fine. I have documented the results and included a recording of the test in the attached walkthrough."

I opened the Walkthrough which had the verification report including screenshots. But the screenshot did not show the hero image - when I ran the app, the hero image is shown. ... Minor issue in the verification.

Committed the change using Editor UI Commit button. Pushed the changes using Sync button.

Antigravity AI tasks run slowly on my PC. 

While the task I gave above was very simple, barring one crash issue, Antigravity seems to have done the job, which involved:
  • After understanding the requirement, identifying which files have to be changed/deleted.
  • Doing those changes.
  • Testing the app, verifying its results and providing a verification report.
That I think is proper agentic workflow.
====================

ChatGPT (CG) chat: Google Jules Overview

Me: Can you compare Google Jules with Google Antigravity, https://antigravity.google/

CG: Here’s a clear comparative breakdown of Google Jules vs Google Antigravity (AI‑powered IDE) — two different AI-centric tools from Google for coding assistance and automation. (Wikipedia)

🧠 Purpose & Core Concept

• Google Jules

  • A headless autonomous coding agent that works outside of an IDE.

  • You create tasks/tickets (for example, via GitHub Issues), and Jules runs in the background to plan, write, and commit code changes.

  • It doesn’t provide an editor UI — it produces pull requests once work is done.

  • Best for maintenance tasks like upgrading dependencies, writing tests, fixing well-defined bugs. (inferred from earlier info on Jules context)

• Google Antigravity

  • A full AI-powered Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with an agent-first design.

  • Combines a traditional code editor with multi-agent orchestration: agents can edit code, run commands in a terminal, open a browser, and validate outputs.

  • Provides visible interface panels for managing agents and their outputs inside the IDE. (Wikipedia)


💻 Workflow & Interaction

FeatureJulesAntigravity
User InterfaceNo UI — task specification onlyFull IDE with editor + agent manager
Execution StyleAsynchronous work via background tasksInteractive + asynchronous agent workflows in IDE
How You Give InstructionsWritten tickets / issuesNatural-language and in-editor commands
Output DeliveryGitHub pull requests/commitsInstant code edits in editor + agent artifacts
Agent ControlMinimal live control once task is submittedReal-time oversight and steering of agents
Best FitDefined tasks, simple automationComplex feature creation, refactoring, large workflows

Antigravity’s interface supports parallel agent orchestration (mission control view) and artifact creation (plans, screenshots, and automated test results) to verify work. (ShipAi)


🚀 Typical Use Cases

Jules
✔ Ideal when you have repetitive development work you can assign as discrete tasks
✔ Maintenance, tests, documentation, basic code quality improvements

Antigravity
✔ Full project development within an IDE
✔ Complex logic tasks, cross-file refactoring, integrated test execution
✔ Immediate developer collaboration with AI

In other words, Jules is more like assigning tasks to an independent assistant, while Antigravity embeds the AI into your live development workflow. (WellWells)


🧩 Model & Platform Differences

  • Jules typically runs externally (e.g., in cloud) and focuses on task completion with GitHub integration.

  • Antigravity runs locally on your machine (Windows/macOS/Linux), includes agents with access to editor, terminal, and browser, and supports multiple models — not just Google’s (e.g., Claude and OpenAI OSS variants). (Wikipedia)


📌 Strengths & Limitations

Jules

Strengths

  • Low-touch automation; works without manual oversight once a ticket is posted.

  • Good for long-running, well-scoped tasks.

Limitations

  • No real-time control or visualization during execution.

  • Less suited for exploratory development or interactive debugging.


Antigravity

Strengths

  • Multimodal agent access (editor, terminal, browser).

  • Agents can generate Artifacts that help you verify or guide work.

  • Supports multiple AI models.

Limitations

  • Still in preview, with wide-ranging user reports of bugs, errors, and instability.

  • Because agents can execute code and commands, there are potential security and safety concerns that need careful user management. (The Indian Express)


🧠 Philosophical Difference

  • Jules: Work submission model — you submit a ticket, get a completed job back.

  • Antigravity: Interactive agent ecosystem — you and AI co-develop, inspect, and refine work together.


🟡 Bottom Line

If Google Jules is like hiring an assistant who returns a completed task later, then Antigravity is like having an AI co-developer sitting next to you in your IDE — planning, executing, and verifying code interactively.
They share the same broader goal (automating development with AI), but they target different parts of the workflow:

  • Jules focuses on headless task automation.

  • Antigravity focuses on agent-first interactive development. (Wikipedia)


If you want, I can also break this down into best practices for when to choose one over the other depending on your project size, team workflow, and tolerance for instability.

Comments