Notes about Google Antigravity used in Google AI Pro plan; Jules vs Antigravity

Last minor update on 13 Mar 2026

Related post: Index for posts on Feb 2026 notes about Google AI Pro plan features for software development work. It has section links (jump links) for posts that have them. 

Summary

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Antigravity : "Google Antigravity is an AI-powered integrated development environment (IDE) developed by Google, designed for prioritizing AI agents platform for software development. Announced on November 18, 2025 alongside the release of Gemini 3, Antigravity enables developers to delegate complex coding tasks to autonomous AI agents powered primarily by Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash models. The platform is a heavily modified fork of Visual Studio Code."

The official website provides free download for various OS including Windows:  https://antigravity.google/

  • Has a free plan
  • Recommended plan is "Developer plan via Google One" - "Leverage Antigravity as your daily driver via your Google AI Pro or Ultra subscription."
Official videos by Google Antigravity on YouTube:

ChatGPT view summary of Jules vs Antigravity

🧠 Purpose & Core Concept

• Google Jules

  • headless autonomous coding agent that works outside of an IDE.

  • You create tasks/tickets (for example, via GitHub Issues), and Jules runs in the background to plan, write, and commit code changes.

  • It doesn’t provide an editor UI — it produces pull requests once work is done.

  • Best for maintenance tasks like upgrading dependencies, writing tests, fixing well-defined bugs. (inferred from earlier info on Jules context)

• Google Antigravity

  • full AI-powered Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with an agent-first design.

  • Combines a traditional code editor with multi-agent orchestration: agents can edit code, run commands in a terminal, open a browser, and validate outputs.

  • Provides visible interface panels for managing agents and their outputs inside the IDE. (Wikipedia)

💻 Workflow & Interaction

FeatureJulesAntigravity
User InterfaceNo UI — task specification onlyFull IDE with editor + agent manager
Execution StyleAsynchronous work via background tasksInteractive + asynchronous agent workflows in IDE
How You Give InstructionsWritten tickets / issuesNatural-language and in-editor commands
Output DeliveryGitHub pull requests/commitsInstant code edits in editor + agent artifacts
Agent ControlMinimal live control once task is submittedReal-time oversight and steering of agents
Best FitDefined tasks, simple automationComplex feature creation, refactoring, large workflows

Antigravity’s interface supports parallel agent orchestration (mission control view) and artifact creation (plans, screenshots, and automated test results) to verify work. (ShipAi)

Model & Platform Differences

  • Jules typically runs externally (e.g., in cloud) and focuses on task completion with GitHub integration.

  • Antigravity runs locally on your machine (Windows/macOS/Linux), includes agents with access to editor, terminal, and browser, and supports multiple models — not just Google’s (e.g., Claude and OpenAI OSS variants). (Wikipedia)

------- end ChatGPT view summary of Jules vs Antigravity --------

Overview of my simple task trial of Antigravity with a very simple Astro static landing page site

  • 1st prompt: The app contains a Support page. I want to remove it. Also footer and any other menu links to Support page should be removed.
  • Took quite some time. Faced agent crash! But it understood the requirement, identified which files have to be changed/deleted, and did those changes which included deletion of a file for which it sought specific approval from me.
  • 2nd prompt: The code changes for removing support page are done. Can you test whether the app is working correctly?
  • It tested the app, verified its results and provided a verification report. The app worked as expected.
  • So it seems to have done a proper agentic workflow even though it crashed after 1st prompt.
Live site: https://ravisiyer.github.io/ssw-astroghp/ site was updated with above changes and works as expected.
============================================================
============================================================

Details

20:03, 24 February 2026


Looks like my Google AI Pro plan will provide me Developer plan!

I am downloading Antigravity for Windows x64 - 166 MB download. 
20:42, 24 February 2026 Had to resume download (switched to Jio from Airtel before resume). The download picked up from where it had stopped (around 40+ MB).
It got completed in few minutes after resume.

Before install C drive: 29.8 GB free

Install says: At least 791.9 MB of free disk space is required.
Install processing work took around 2 to 3 mins.

App start took long. Windows Firewall popup -> Allow permission had to be given for Antigravity - that took time.
Finally Antigravity setup process UI...
  • Chose import settings from VSCode, Dark mode
  • Going with default "Review-driven development" (recommended). Later may try out "Agent-driven development"
  • Went with some other defaults
Am shown option to open ssw-astro and other recent "workspaces" which I had last edited in VSCode. Chose ssw-astro.

It opened the ssw-astro project. The UI is similar to VSCode but instead of CoPilot, the Agent seems to be Antigravity.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) is the selected model. Claude Sonnet and Opus 4.6 are also provided as options!

C drive free space after install is 29.0 GB.

I am trying out this prompt:
The app contains a Support page. I want to remove it. Also footer and any other menu links to Support page should be removed.
------
Took time. ... Approved one step.
For next step of: Removing references to support page from menu.ts, deleting support.astro, and inspecting globals.css.
  • Faced my first agent crash.
  • But it had made the changes correctly including deletion of Support page for which I had to give specific approval.
Next prompt I gave:
The code changes for removing support page are done. Can you test whether the app is working correctly?

It did the testing (opening browser, loading site ... and generated a recording of the test). It said: "I have successfully tested the application locally to verify the Support page removal. I used a browser agent to check the app and confirmed that it renders correctly. The Support link is no longer present in the navigation menu or footer, and basic routing is working fine. I have documented the results and included a recording of the test in the attached walkthrough."

I opened the Walkthrough which had the verification report including screenshots. But the screenshot did not show the hero image - when I ran the app, the hero image is shown. ... Minor issue in the verification.

Committed the change using Editor UI Commit button. Pushed the changes using Sync button.

Antigravity AI tasks run slowly on my PC. Were they slower than using CoPilot free-tier with Claude Haiku 4.5 model (got exhausted in 2 days) for such multi-file reading and editing tasks (CoPilot free tier does not run and test app)? I am not sure but they Antigravity with Gemini Pro 3.1 (High) may have been slower. For both CoPilot with Claude Haiku 4.5 and Antigravity with Gemini Pro 3.1 (High), I had to wait while it was thinking, planning and then executing these very simple programming tasks.

Were Antigravity with Gemini Pro 3.1 (High) tasks slower than Google Jules? I cannot say as I switched to different work after assigning the tasks to Jules and did not really note the time interval when I was shown the notification that Jules had done a stage in the task and was waiting for my approval. With Antigravity as I was in synchronous mode, I was essentially waiting for Antigravity to progress and so the time it was taking registered easily on my mind. IFIRC, Antigravity also seems to have a notification mechanism. So I could have switched to another task.

While the task I gave above was very simple, barring one crash issue, Antigravity seems to have done the job, which involved:
  • After understanding the requirement, identifying which files have to be changed/deleted.
  • Doing those changes which included deletion of a file for which it sought specific approval from me.
  • Testing the app, verifying its results and providing a verification report.
That I think is proper agentic workflow.
====================

ChatGPT (CG) chat: Google Jules Overview

Me: Can you compare Google Jules with Google Antigravity, https://antigravity.google/

CG: Here’s a clear comparative breakdown of Google Jules vs Google Antigravity (AI‑powered IDE) — two different AI-centric tools from Google for coding assistance and automation. (Wikipedia)

🧠 Purpose & Core Concept

• Google Jules

  • A headless autonomous coding agent that works outside of an IDE.

  • You create tasks/tickets (for example, via GitHub Issues), and Jules runs in the background to plan, write, and commit code changes.

  • It doesn’t provide an editor UI — it produces pull requests once work is done.

  • Best for maintenance tasks like upgrading dependencies, writing tests, fixing well-defined bugs. (inferred from earlier info on Jules context)

• Google Antigravity

  • A full AI-powered Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with an agent-first design.

  • Combines a traditional code editor with multi-agent orchestration: agents can edit code, run commands in a terminal, open a browser, and validate outputs.

  • Provides visible interface panels for managing agents and their outputs inside the IDE. (Wikipedia)


💻 Workflow & Interaction

FeatureJulesAntigravity
User InterfaceNo UI — task specification onlyFull IDE with editor + agent manager
Execution StyleAsynchronous work via background tasksInteractive + asynchronous agent workflows in IDE
How You Give InstructionsWritten tickets / issuesNatural-language and in-editor commands
Output DeliveryGitHub pull requests/commitsInstant code edits in editor + agent artifacts
Agent ControlMinimal live control once task is submittedReal-time oversight and steering of agents
Best FitDefined tasks, simple automationComplex feature creation, refactoring, large workflows

Antigravity’s interface supports parallel agent orchestration (mission control view) and artifact creation (plans, screenshots, and automated test results) to verify work. (ShipAi)


🚀 Typical Use Cases

Jules
✔ Ideal when you have repetitive development work you can assign as discrete tasks
✔ Maintenance, tests, documentation, basic code quality improvements

Antigravity
✔ Full project development within an IDE
✔ Complex logic tasks, cross-file refactoring, integrated test execution
✔ Immediate developer collaboration with AI

In other words, Jules is more like assigning tasks to an independent assistant, while Antigravity embeds the AI into your live development workflow. (WellWells)


🧩 Model & Platform Differences

  • Jules typically runs externally (e.g., in cloud) and focuses on task completion with GitHub integration.

  • Antigravity runs locally on your machine (Windows/macOS/Linux), includes agents with access to editor, terminal, and browser, and supports multiple models — not just Google’s (e.g., Claude and OpenAI OSS variants). (Wikipedia)


📌 Strengths & Limitations

Jules

Strengths

  • Low-touch automation; works without manual oversight once a ticket is posted.

  • Good for long-running, well-scoped tasks.

Limitations

  • No real-time control or visualization during execution.

  • Less suited for exploratory development or interactive debugging.


Antigravity

Strengths

  • Multimodal agent access (editor, terminal, browser).

  • Agents can generate Artifacts that help you verify or guide work.

  • Supports multiple AI models.

Limitations

  • Still in preview, with wide-ranging user reports of bugs, errors, and instability.

  • Because agents can execute code and commands, there are potential security and safety concerns that need careful user management. (The Indian Express)


🧠 Philosophical Difference

  • Jules: Work submission model — you submit a ticket, get a completed job back.

  • Antigravity: Interactive agent ecosystem — you and AI co-develop, inspect, and refine work together.


🟡 Bottom Line

If Google Jules is like hiring an assistant who returns a completed task later, then Antigravity is like having an AI co-developer sitting next to you in your IDE — planning, executing, and verifying code interactively.
They share the same broader goal (automating development with AI), but they target different parts of the workflow:

  • Jules focuses on headless task automation.

  • Antigravity focuses on agent-first interactive development. (Wikipedia)


If you want, I can also break this down into best practices for when to choose one over the other depending on your project size, team workflow, and tolerance for instability.

======================
13:59, 25 February 2026
Deploying to GHP but running scripts from terminal of Antigravity (instead of VSCode).
Antigravity does not seem to have added a proper Open With feature in Windows Explorer and so I cannot use context menu to open the project folder with Antigravity. I have to open Antigravity app separately.

npm run build:ghp
npm run deploy:ghp
Terminal execution of above two commands were like in VSCode.
https://ravisiyer.github.io/ssw-astroghp/ site is updated with changes and works as expected.
---------

I should add here that while I had not known about Google Jules prior to yesterday or day-before-yesterday, I had read references to Antigravity in the news and social media. But I had not known or registered in my mind that Antigravity is from Google and so had not read up those references.

Comments

Archive

Show more