Main notes about Google AI Pro plan features for software development work - Part 3
To get the most out of your 18-month window in VS Code, here is how the two pieces fit together:
1. The VS Code Extension (Gemini Code Assist)
This is your primary interface. You install it directly from the VS Code Marketplace (search for "Gemini Code Assist").
What it does: It provides the chat sidebar, inline code completion (ghost text), and the "Agent Mode."
The "Secret" Connection: When you install the extension, it actually installs a version of the Gemini CLI in the background to power its "Agent Mode."
Why you need it: This is where you get the "visual" benefits—like the side-by-side diff view where you can click "Accept" or "Reject" on code changes.
2. The NPM Package (@google/gemini-cli)
Even though the extension has a "hidden" CLI, you should still install the global CLI manually using:
npm install -g @google/gemini-cli
What it does: It gives you the
geminicommand directly in your PowerShell/Terminal.Why you need it: * Automation: You can pipe your PowerShell scripts into it (e.g.,
dir | gemini "summarize these files").Advanced Config: The global CLI allows you to run
/settingsand enable Preview Features, which often rolls out new Gemini 3.1 capabilities before they are fully polished in the VS Code UI.PowerShell Integration: As a PowerShell user, you can use the CLI for "non-coding" tasks, like analyzing logs or local files without even opening VS Code.
## Comparison: Extension vs. Manual CLI
| Feature | VS Code Extension | Manual CLI (NPM) |
| Interface | Sidebar & Keyboard Shortcuts. | Your PowerShell Terminal. |
| Code Edits | Visual Diffs (Accept/Reject). | Direct file writing or console output. |
| Agent Mode | Integrated (Easier to use). | Raw (More powerful/customizable). |
| Context | Uses @file and @workspace. | Uses /path and /context. |
| Best For... | Active "Foreground" coding. | Scripts, automation, and "Background" analysis. |
## My Recommendation for Setup
Install the Extension first: Go to the VS Code Extensions view, search for Gemini Code Assist, and sign in with your Jio-linked account. This gives you immediate 1M+ token context and Gemini 3.1 Pro power.
Install the CLI globally: Run
npm install -g @google/gemini-cliin your terminal.Sync them: Run
gemini --versionin your PowerShell. If it’s working, your VS Code extension and your terminal will now share the same high-quota "Pro" bucket.
Would you like me to provide a few PowerShell one-liners that demonstrate how the CLI can analyze your "Timestamp Tracker" files directly from the terminal?
VS Code has evolved into a "unified agent command center."
1. The "Unified Chat" Experience
VS Code now features a "Multi-Agent Sessions" view.
You will see a dropdown in your chat window where you can toggle between
@copilotand@gemini.Since your Gemini (Google AI Pro) quota is much larger, you can use Gemini for the heavy "Agentic" work (multi-file refactors) while keeping Copilot active for simple single-line "ghost text" autocompletions.
2. Managing the "Ghost Text" Conflict
The only real friction occurs when both tools try to suggest the "next line" of code as you type (ghost text).
The "Two Chef" Problem: If both are active, they may overlap and look messy.
The Solution: Most developers on the Google AI Pro plan disable Copilot's "Inline Suggestions" but keep the Copilot extension installed for its specific "GitHub-native" features.
Go to Settings (
Ctrl+,) -> Search forgithub.copilot.inlineSuggestions:enableand set it tofalse.Now, Gemini handles your typing suggestions, but you can still use the Copilot chat if you need to.
3. Agent Mode vs. Cloud Agent
A key distinction in 2026:
Gemini Agent Mode: Uses your local CLI + Pro plan to edit your local files directly with high accuracy (Gemini 3.1 Pro).
Copilot Cloud Agent: This is Microsoft's answer to Jules. It works in the cloud.
You can actually have Copilot Cloud Agent and Google Jules working on two different branches of the same project simultaneously.
## Which one is the "Leader"?
Since you have the 18-month Pro plan, Gemini is your clear "Leader."
Context: Gemini can "see" 1 million+ tokens (your entire repo + documentation), whereas Copilot is still more limited in how many files it can "digest" at once.
Logic: For your complex Gita API and Timestamp Tracker, Gemini 3.1 Pro's reasoning will generally outperform the free version of Copilot you were using.
The "Pro" Strategy: Install the Gemini extension, sign in, and let it take over your Inline Suggestions.
Would you like me to show you the specific VS Code setting to make Gemini your default "Primary" AI so it takes priority over Copilot?
1. In the VS Code Extension (Gemini Code Assist)
By default, the extension handles model selection for you using a feature called Auto-Routing.
The Logic: It analyzes your prompt—if you ask a simple question, it uses a faster "Flash" model to save your quota. If you ask for a complex multi-file refactor, it automatically switches to Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Your Choice: You can override this. In the chat window, there is a Model Selector dropdown (usually at the top or bottom of the chat pane). Since you have the AI Pro plan, you will see options like:
Auto (Recommended): Best balance of speed and logic.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: Forces the "heavyweight" reasoning model for every turn.
Gemini 3 Flash: Forces the lightning-fast model for simple tasks.
2. In the Manual CLI (gemini command)
When you use the CLI in PowerShell, you have even more granular control. You can specify the model in two ways:
The Startup Flag: You can launch the CLI with a specific model using the
-mflag:gemini -m gemini-3.1-proThe Slash Command: Once the CLI is open, you can type
/modelto open an interactive menu where you can switch models on the fly.
## Why this matters for your 18-month window
As a software developer, you'll want to be strategic about which model you "force":
| Model | Best For... | Why use it? |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | The "Show-stoppers" | Highest reasoning. Use this for your Next.js to Astro migrations or complex Gita API logic. |
| Gemini 3 Flash | The "Grunt Work" | Use this for adding comments, renaming variables, or writing basic unit tests. It's nearly instant. |
| Auto-Routing | Daily Coding | Let Google's "orchestrator" manage your quota. It's surprisingly good at knowing when it needs to bring in the "big brain" (Pro). |
## A "Pro" Tip for PowerShell
Since you like PowerShell, you can create aliases for different "modes." For example, you could set an alias gempro that always launches the CLI with the 3.1 Pro model, so you don't have to remember the long model names.
One final note: To see the absolute latest Gemini 3.1 Pro (the one that doubled the reasoning score of 3.0), you may need to enable "Preview Features" in your CLI settings.
Would you like me to show you the one-line command to check which models your specific Pro account currently has access to?
1. The "Only Gemini" Myth
By default, the Gemini Code Assist extension and the Gemini CLI are "first-party" tools—they are designed to use Gemini 3.1 Pro and Flash.
However, Google has made a strategic shift toward Model Neutrality via a protocol called MCP (Model Context Protocol).
2. Can you use other models?
Directly in the CLI: Not natively. You cannot simply type a command to "switch to Claude" inside the Google-branded CLI. It is a harness specifically for Gemini's reasoning engine and its 1-million-token context window.
Via Antigravity: If you decide to try Google Antigravity (which you mentioned earlier), the answer changes to Yes. Antigravity is an "Agent-First IDE" that allows you to swap the "brain" of your agents.
In its settings, you can often choose between: Gemini 3.1 Pro (Default)
Claude 4.6 Opus (Known for superior "vibe coding" and logic)
Llama 3.2 (Open source)
3. Why the CLI sticks to Gemini
Google keeps the CLI focused on Gemini because of the Context Window.
Gemini's Advantage: The CLI can ingest your entire repo (1M+ tokens) for a fraction of the cost and "compute" power that a model like Claude would require for the same task.
The Speed: Since the CLI is designed for rapid terminal actions (like "find all instances of this bug"), it relies on the low-latency "Flash" models that Google has optimized specifically for this tool.
## Comparison: Model Choice vs. Tool Choice
| Feature | Gemini CLI / VS Code Ext. | Google Antigravity |
| Model Choice | Locked to Gemini (Auto-routes between 3.1 Pro/Flash). | Multi-Model: Can use Gemini, Claude, or Llama. |
| Strengths | Deep integration with Google Cloud & local files. | Best for "Model Shopping" to find the smartest answer. |
| Context | 1 Million+ Tokens. | Varies by model (usually 200k for Claude). |
## My Recommendation
Since you have the AI Pro plan, stick with the Gemini 3.1 Pro model inside the CLI for your PowerShell and React Native work. It is currently the only model that can "see" your entire project context without hitting a massive "Context Tax" or slowing down.
If you ever run into a logic problem that Gemini can't solve (which is rare in the 3.1 version), that is the moment to open Antigravity and try the same task with Claude 4.6.
Would you like me to show you how to use an MCP server with the Gemini CLI so you can connect it to non-Google tools like Slack or Jira?
As a Google AI Pro subscriber, you aren't just limited to "free tier" scraps. Here is the breakdown of how your plan interacts with non-Google models like Opus 4.6 in Antigravity (Ag):
1. The "Vertex AI Model Garden" Integration
Google Antigravity doesn't just "plug in" to the public Claude website; it pulls these models through Google Vertex AI (specifically the "Model Garden").
The Benefit: Because you have the AI Pro plan, Google grants you "Member-Level" quotas for third-party models inside Antigravity.
The Reality: You get significantly higher limits than a free user.
While a free user might get a few messages an hour, your Pro plan typically provides a 5-hour refresh window with a generous bucket of tokens for Opus 4.6.
2. The "Priority" Catch
Even with your Pro plan, there is a hierarchy of performance.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Your Native Advantage): This is your "unlimited" workhorse. Your Pro plan gives you the highest priority and massive daily request limits here.
Opus 4.6 (The Guest Model): While your limits are high, they are not "infinite." Since Google has to pay Anthropic to serve those tokens, they apply a "Fair Use" cap. If you use Opus 4.6 for 8 hours straight for "vibe coding," you might see a message saying: "Opus quota reached. Switching to Gemini 3.1 Pro for the remainder of this window."
3. Using your Monthly Cloud Credits
This is your "secret weapon." Your Google AI Pro plan includes $10/month in Google Cloud credits.
If you hit the standard "Pro" limit for Opus 4.6 in Antigravity, you can toggle a setting to "Use Cloud Credits for Overages."
This allows you to keep using the top-tier Opus model by drawing from that $10 credit pool instead of being cut off or downgraded to the free tier.
## Comparison: Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro (On your Plan)
| Feature | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Quota Source | Your native AI Pro subscription. | Vertex AI "Model Garden" allowance. |
| Daily Limits | Extremely High (effectively unlimited for 1 dev). | Capped by "Fair Use" (Refresh every 5 hours). |
| Context Window | 1 Million+ Tokens (Full Repo). | ~200k Tokens (Partial Repo). |
| Best Use Case | Large-scale refactors, deep logic. | Creative UI design, "Vibe coding" from scratch. |
## My Advice for your 18-month Window
Don't fear the "free tier" limit. Your Pro plan makes you a Priority User in Antigravity.
The Winning Strategy:
Start with Gemini 3.1 Pro: Use it for the "heavy lifting" (like your Gita API logic) where you need to see the whole codebase.
Switch to Opus 4.6: Use it for the "creative polish" or when you feel the AI needs a "second opinion" on a tricky bug.
Monitor the Quota: Antigravity has a small "Quota Meter" in the bottom right corner. If it turns yellow, it’s a sign to switch back to Gemini for a few hours.
Would you like me to show you how to activate your $10 Google Cloud credits so they are ready to cover any "Opus Overages" in Antigravity?
The UI Advantage of Antigravity (Ag)
In Ag, the complexity of managing different AI models is hidden behind a clean interface:
The Dropdown: You simply click a menu to swap between Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 4.6, or GPT-OSS. There’s no need to remember model strings or API keys.
The Quota Meter: You get a visual "fuel gauge" that shows how much of your Opus or Gemini quota you've used for the current window.
Multi-Agent Manager: You can actually see different agents working in parallel—one might be using Opus to architect a UI while another uses Gemini Flash to run your tests in the background.
The "Power User" Reality of the CLI
The CLI is intentionally "lean." While it is incredibly fast and great for your PowerShell automation, it doesn't give you that "one-click" flexibility:
Manual Switching: To change models, you have to type commands like
/model set claude-opus-4.6.Single-Threaded: It generally focuses on one task at a time. It's not designed to orchestrate a "team" of agents like Ag is.
No Visual Feedback: You don't get the live browser preview or the agent planning boards that make Ag so impressive for "vibe coding."
## My Advice for your Route Map
Since you have that 18-month window to explore, I recommend this "Best of Both Worlds" setup:
Use Antigravity for "Discovery & Design": When you want to see what Opus 4.6 thinks of your Gita API architecture or how it would build a complex React Native screen, use Ag. The UI will help you compare models side-by-side easily.
Use the CLI for "Execution & Automation": Once you have your architecture settled, use the CLI inside your regular VS Code or PowerShell terminal. It’s better for the "grunt work"—renaming variables, searching through 50 files for a specific bug, or running automated backups.
A Quick Warning for 2026: Some users have reported a "Model Identity" bug in the current Ag preview where selecting Opus 4.6 sometimes routes to Sonnet if your daily quota is low. Always check the "Quota Meter" in the bottom corner to be sure you're getting the "Big Brain" model you selected!
Would you like me to show you the specific keyboard shortcut in Antigravity to toggle the "Agent Manager" view so you can see your multiple agents in action?
To use an analogy: The Model is the engine, but Antigravity is the high-performance chassis and the expert driver.
Here is why your understanding is partially right, and where the "software layer" actually changes the quality of the code you get:
1. Where you are Right: The "Engine" (Model Logic)
If you ask an AI to write a complex regex or a recursive function, the quality depends almost entirely on the model's training.
Gemini 3.1 Pro or Opus 4.6 will naturally understand edge cases and "clean code" principles better than a smaller model like Haiku.
In this specific "pure generation" task, the IDE is just a window.
2. Where the IDE (Ag) actually "Plays a Huge Role"
In 2026, "Agentic" software like Antigravity isn't just a UI; it is an Active Orchestrator that improves code quality through three specific mechanisms that a simple chatbot can't do:
A. Automated Verification (The "Test-Loop")
When you use a chatbot, it gives you code and hopes it works. When you use Antigravity:
The agent writes the code.
It then autonomously opens the terminal and runs
npm test.If the tests fail, the agent reads the error, realizes its mistake, and rewrites the code before you even see it.
Result: The final code you see is higher quality because it has already been "vetted" by a real compiler.
B. Long-Horizon Planning (The "Mission Control")
Standard chatbots often "lose the plot" after a few messages. Antigravity uses Planning Mode:
Before writing a single line, it generates an Implementation Plan and a Task List.
It "checks" this plan against your entire codebase (using its 1M+ token context).
Result: This prevents the AI from "fixing" one file while accidentally breaking three others—a common issue with simple copy-paste workflows.
C. Tool Actuation (The "Browser & Shell" Advantage)
This is the biggest differentiator for your Gita API or Next.js work.
Ag can spawn a Browser Sub-agent. If it's unsure how a new library works, it doesn't "hallucinate"; it goes to the library's website, reads the 2026 documentation, and uses the actual latest syntax.
Result: You get code that is "up-to-date" with the real world, not just the model's training data.
## Summary: The "Quality" Equation
| Factor | The Model (Pro/Opus) | The IDE (Antigravity) |
| Responsibility | Logic, Syntax, Reasoning. | Context, Verification, Planning. |
| Prevents... | Silly bugs, bad logic. | Architecture fails, "out-of-sync" errors. |
| Analog | The "Brain." | The "Hands and Eyes." |
## My Advice for your Route Map
Don't underestimate the "software layer." While Gemini 3.1 Pro is the "Big Brain," using it inside Antigravity makes it a "Big Brain with a Safety Net."
If you just copy-paste code from a chat, you are the only one doing the testing. If you use Antigravity, the IDE itself acts as a "Senior Developer" that double-checks the model's homework before handing it to you.
Would you like me to show you how to set up the "Turbo" execution policy in Antigravity so the agent can autonomously run your PowerShell tests while it codes?
In a standard "chatbot" workflow, if you find a bug, you have to copy the error, paste it back, and ask for a fix. In Antigravity, the "software layer" automates this conversation.
The Antigravity "Self-Correction" Loop
When Ag is running a task (like your Gita API or Next.js work), it follows a specific sequence if it hits a bug during verification:
Detection: The agent runs a terminal command (like
npm testornode app.js) or checks the Browser console. It detects a non-zero exit code or an error log.Autonomous Analysis: Instead of stopping, the agent reads the Stack Trace or the Linter error. It treats this as a new piece of data.
The Feedback Loop: It hands this error back to the "brain" (Gemini 3.1 Pro or Opus 4.6) with a prompt like: "The code you just wrote caused this error: [Error Message]. Analyze the existing files and the error, then provide a corrected version."
Re-Implementation: The model generates a fix. The agent applies the diff to the file.
Re-Verification: The agent runs the test again. It will repeat this loop (usually up to 3–5 times) until the code passes or it determines it's "stuck."
## What happens if it gets "Stuck"?
If the model keeps failing, the "software layer" switches from Autonomous Mode to Collaboration Mode:
Artifact Flagging: It will highlight the failing step in the Task List with a red icon.
Human Intervention: It presents you with an "Artifact" (like a screenshot of the error or a log) and asks: "I tried to fix this 3 times but the build still fails. Here is the error. How should I proceed?"
Your Role: You can click on the Artifact and leave a comment—exactly like a Google Doc comment—saying: "You're forgetting to wrap the API call in an async block." The agent reads your comment and tries again.
## Comparison: Verification Styles
| Action | Standard Chatbot / Copilot | Antigravity (Ag) |
| Who runs the code? | You (Manually). | The Agent (Autonomously). |
| Who sees the bug? | You. | The Agent. |
| Who starts the fix? | You (by re-prompting). | The Agent (automatically re-prompts itself). |
| Human Role | The "Driver" (Hands-on). | The "Architect" (High-level review). |
## My Advice for your 18-month "Pro" window
Since you have the AI Pro plan, you have access to "Turbo Mode" in Antigravity.
Warning: Be careful with Turbo Mode! It allows the agent to run terminal commands without asking your permission. On your Gita API project, this is great because it can fix and re-test bugs in seconds. But never run Turbo Mode on a project where a rogue command could delete important local data (like your main backup folders).
The Strategy: Use "Planning Mode" for your show-stopper bugs. It forces the agent to show you its "plan" to fix the bug before it starts the loop, giving you a chance to correct its logic early.
Would you like me to show you how to configure the "Rules" in Antigravity so the agent always knows to run your specific PowerShell test script after every bug fix?
While the underlying model (Gemini 3.1 Pro or Opus 4.6) provides the "intelligence," the software layer (like Ag or Google Antigravity) provides the "process."
The Orchestrator's Workflow
The specific loop you described—where the agent generates code, runs a test, sees an error, and feeds it back to the model for a fix—is often referred to by three specific technical terms:
Self-Correction / Self-Reflection: This is the act of the model looking at its own "mistake" (the bug) and reasoning through a fix.
The ReAct Pattern (Reason + Act): This is the framework where the agent thinks ("I need to fix the API"), takes an action (runs a command), observes the result (sees the error), and then thinks again to refine its next move.
Agentic Engineering: This is the broader 2026 term for using these autonomous loops to build software, where the human acts more as a Supervisor than a coder.
The "SOP" (Standard Operating Procedure)
In Antigravity, this orchestration is managed by a "System Prompt" or "Playbook" that essentially tells the model:
"Never consider a task 'Done' until the terminal returns an Exit Code 0. If you see an error, do not ask the user; analyze the log and try to fix it yourself up to 3 times."
## Summary Table: Model vs. Orchestrator
| Feature | The Model (The Brain) | The Orchestrator (The Hands/Process) |
| Role | Reasoning & Synthesis. | Verification & Feedback Loops. |
| Example | Gemini 3.1 Pro / Opus 4.6. | Antigravity / Google Jules / Ag. |
| Success Metric | Accuracy of the logic. | Completion of the Task List. |
| What it prevents | Hallucinations & bad syntax. | Unfinished tasks & "broken" code. |
The Bottom Line: You are correctly identifying that the "Intelligence" is in the model, but the "Reliability" is in the Orchestration.
Next Step: Since you mentioned your background work with Jules, would you like to see the "Task Log" of a Jules-run fix? It shows you exactly how many "Self-Correction" loops it went through before it felt confident enough to send you the Pull Request.
While the underlying model (Gemini 3.1 Pro) provides the Raw Reasoning, the Orchestrator (Antigravity/Ag) provides the Strategic Intelligence.
To use a corporate analogy: If Gemini is the brilliant Subject Matter Expert, the Orchestrator is the Senior Project Manager. Both are highly intelligent, but their "brains" are used for different things.
1. The Two Types of Intelligence at Play
| Feature | Model Intelligence (The "Expert") | Orchestrator Intelligence (The "Manager") |
| Focus | Logic, Syntax, Knowledge. | Goals, Tools, Verification. |
| Strength | "How do I write a recursive Gita API fetch?" | "Should I run a test now or search the web for documentation?" |
| Logic | Generative: Creates the code. | Agentic: Decisions on what to do next. |
| Mistake handling | Might hallucinate a fix. | Detects the failure and decides to "re-try" with a different approach. |
2. Why the Orchestrator (Ag) needs its own "Brain"
The software sitting on top of the model (the Orchestrator) performs three "high-intelligence" tasks that a standard chatbot cannot:
A. Dynamic Routing
In 2026, a single task isn't handled by one model.
The Orchestrator maintains a "Long-term Memory." It knows that three hours ago, you told it you preferred a specific naming convention for your Timestamp Tracker. It injects that context into the model's prompt just-in-time so the code remains consistent.
C. The "Self-Correction" Loop (ReAct)
As we discussed, when a bug is found, the Orchestrator doesn't just "pass the error back." It performs Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning:
Observation: "The terminal returned a 404 error."
Thought: "The API URL in
config.jsmight be wrong or the server isn't running."Action: "I will run
psto see if the process is active before I try to fix the code."
3. The "Intelligence Fabric"
In 2026, we call this the "Intelligence Fabric." It’s not about one giant model doing everything; it's about a highly intelligent "Orchestration Layer" that coordinates dozens of smaller, specialized "worker" models.
My Advice for your "Pro" Plan
Because you are using Google AI Pro, you are essentially paying for a "Premium Manager."
In AI Studio: The orchestration is thin. If the code breaks, the "manager" often gives up or repeats the same mistake.
In Antigravity/Jules: The "manager" is much smarter. It uses a "Planning Critic"—a separate AI pass that looks at the proposed fix and says, "Wait, that fix will break the Auth module, try again."
The takeaway: You need both. A smart engine (Model) in a dumb car (Simple Chat) is frustrating. A smart engine in a smart car (Ag/Orchestrator) is what allows you to do "Background Work" while you focus on the big picture.
Would you like me to show you how to "Audit" an Orchestrator's thoughts? In Ag, you can open a "Trace View" that shows you exactly what the Orchestrator was "thinking" when it decided to fix a bug in your Gita repo.
In the 2026 landscape, Antigravity is no longer just a "coding assistant" plugin; it is a full Agentic Command Center.
## 1. Where the Orchestrator Lives
The orchestrator is built into the "Agent Manager"—a dedicated surface inside Antigravity (usually on the right sidebar or a separate tab).
It is a layer of software that sits above the models (Gemini 3.1 Pro or Opus 4.6).
It has "first-class" control over your Editor, Terminal, and Browser Preview.
Its "intelligence" comes from a specialized set of instructions (often called a System Prompt or Plan Critic) that tells the AI how to act as a project manager, not just a writer.
## 2. The Components of the Antigravity Orchestrator
When you use Antigravity, the "Orchestrator" is actually made up of these four high-intelligence systems:
| Component | What it does | Why it needs "Intelligence" |
| Agent Manager | Spawns and tracks parallel agents. | Decides how to split a big task into smaller "Frontend" and "Backend" jobs. |
| Planning Mode | Creates a "Step-by-Step" strategy. | Evaluates if a proposed code change will break your existing Gita API structure. |
| Artifact Panel | Records logs, diffs, and plans. | Acts as the "Paper Trail" so you can audit the agent's logic. |
| Verification Loop | Automatically runs tests and fixes bugs. | Reads terminal errors and decides to "self-correct" instead of bothering you. |
## 3. Why this matters for your workflow
This is why your "Foreground/Background" strategy is so powerful. Because the orchestrator is part of the software:
It is "Context-Aware": It doesn't just see the file you have open; it understands the entire project folder because it has "indexed" it locally.
It is "Autonomous": You can tell the Antigravity orchestrator: "Migrate this project to TypeScript," and then minimize the window. The orchestrator will manage the hundreds of small logic checks, terminal commands, and file updates in the background.
## Summary for your 18-month Window
Think of it this way:
The Model (Gemini 3.1 Pro): Is the "Brain" that knows how to code.
The Orchestrator (Antigravity): Is the "Professional Workflow" that ensures the code is tested, documented, and follows your rules.
The "Pro" Strategy: Since you are using VS Code and the CLI for some tasks, you will notice that the CLI has a "mini-orchestrator" inside it, but the Antigravity orchestrator is much more robust because it can "see" and "touch" the UI and Browser.
Would you like me to show you how to write a "Global Rule" for the Antigravity Orchestrator? This is a file you put in your project that tells the orchestrator: "Every time you write a new function, you MUST also write a corresponding unit test." This ensures the agent never skips the verification step.
This creates a dual-track improvement system for your 18-month window:
1. The Two Paths of Improvement
| Type of Update | Source | What it Improves |
| Model Update | Google's Cloud (API) | Raw Intelligence: Better code logic, fewer hallucinations, and deeper reasoning (e.g., the jump from Gemini 3.0 to 3.1 Pro). |
| Software Update | Ag App Update | Orchestration: Better bug detection, smarter tool use, improved GitHub syncing, and more reliable "Self-Correction" loops. |
2. Recent Example: The "Logic Patch"
As a "Pro" user, you might have noticed a recent update (v.2.1.4) that developers called the "Logic Patch."
The Problem: Before this update, the Antigravity orchestrator was sometimes "too aggressive"—it would refactor code repeatedly in a loop until it broke things (a "recursive conflict").
The Fix: Google didn't change the Gemini model; they updated the Antigravity software to add "safety brakes" and a Manual Override mode.
This improved the orchestration without needing to retrain the underlying AI brain.
3. How this affects your "Background" workflow
When you see an Ag update notification, it often means the "Manager" has gone to school. New updates typically include:
New Agent "Skills": The ability for Jules or Ag to use new terminal commands or specialized PowerShell modules.
Better Conflict Resolution: Improvements in how the orchestrator handles a situation where you edit a file locally at the same time the agent is trying to fix it.
Refined Artifacts: Making the "Task Lists" and "Implementation Plans" more readable so you can supervise them faster.
## Summary for your 18-month "Pro" Plan
You are essentially riding two waves at once:
The Intelligence Wave: Every few months, Google drops a new model (like the recent 3.1 Pro) that makes the agents "smarter."
The Orchestration Wave: Every few weeks, the Ag team drops a software update that makes the agents "more reliable."
The "Pro" Tip: Always check the Changelog in Antigravity after an update. It will often list new "Agent Skills" that you can now use in your PowerShell scripts or Gita API testing.
Would you like me to help you check your current Antigravity version and see if you have the latest "Logic Patch" installed?
It is no longer a case of "one big brain" doing everything. Instead, we have a specialized "double-brain" architecture. Here is how that "AI + AI" partnership actually works in a tool like Antigravity (Ag):
## 1. The "Orchestration" AI (The Project Manager)
This is a specialized AI layer built into the Ag software. It doesn't just "chat"; it reasons about process. * Its "Brain": Often a high-speed model (like Gemini 3 Flash) specifically fine-tuned for Task Decomposition and Tool Selection.
What it does: It looks at your request ("Migrate my Gita API to Astro") and breaks it into 15 logical sub-tasks. It decides which files to open first and which tests to run.
Why it's "AI": Because it has to handle ambiguity. If the terminal throws a weird error, this layer uses AI to decide: "Should I try to fix this myself, search the web, or ask the user for help?"
## 2. The "Inference" AI (The Subject Matter Expert)
This is the "Brain" you choose (Gemini 3.1 Pro or Opus 4.6). It is the heavyweight logic engine.
Its "Brain": A "Reasoning-centric" model that uses Long Thinking (internal deliberation loops) before it outputs a single line of code.
What it does: It writes the actual
fetch()calls, handles the complex JSON parsing, and ensures the React hooks are implemented correctly.Why it's "AI": Because it has General Intelligence and deep coding knowledge across millions of libraries.
## How they work together (The "Symphony")
| Step | Who does it? | The "AI" Action |
| 1. The Mission | Orchestrator | Analyzes your repo and creates a Dependency Graph of all the files that need to change. |
| 2. The Coding | Inference Model | Takes one specific task from the graph and writes the code for it. |
| 3. The Review | Orchestrator | Spawns a separate "Critic Agent" to look at the code and say: "Wait, this violates the user's PowerShell naming rules." |
| 4. The Fix | Inference Model | Rewrites the code based on the Critic's feedback. |
| 5. The Verify | Orchestrator | Autonomously opens the terminal and runs the build. If it fails, it feeds the log back to the Inference Model. |
## Why this is a "Wow!" moment for you
In 2024, if the "Brain" was wrong, the whole thing failed. In 2026, because we have AI in the Orchestration, the system has Resilience.
The "Pro" Plan Benefit: You aren't just paying for the "Brain" (Gemini 3.1 Pro); you are paying for the "Manager" (Ag's Orchestrator) to use that brain effectively for hours at a time while you are away.
## One Final Insight for your Case B
When you manually fix code and sync (Case B), the Orchestrator AI is smart enough to "re-index" your changes. It realizes: "The human has changed the ground truth; I must update my entire Mission Plan to accommodate this new logic." This "Strategic Flexibility" is pure AI at the orchestration level.
Would you like me to show you the "Trace View" in Antigravity? It lets you see the "Conversation" happening between the Orchestrator AI and the Brain AI so you can see exactly how they negotiated a fix for your Gita app.
To settle your mind, think of the architecture as a Nested Loop of Intelligence. You aren't just using an AI; you are using an AI that uses another AI to check its own work.
The 2026 "Double-Brain" Architecture
| Layer | The "Who" | The "What" | Why it's "AI" |
| Orchestrator | Antigravity (Ag) | The Strategic Manager. It breaks your "Gita App" goal into a task list. | It uses Gemini 3 Flash to reason about process (e.g., "I should run the tests before I commit"). |
| Inference | Gemini 3.1 Pro | The Subject Matter Expert. It writes the actual JavaScript logic. | It has the Raw Logic to solve "Humanity's Last Exam" level coding puzzles. |
## Why this is the "Secret Sauce" for your Pro Plan
In your 18-month window, you are seeing the benefit of Google's $100B+ investment in this specific stack. Here is the "Wow" factor:
Self-Healing Code: If Gemini 3.1 Pro writes a bug, the Antigravity Orchestrator (Ag) detects the terminal error, captures the screenshot, and feeds it back to Gemini saying, "You failed. Look at this screenshot and try again."
Parallel Execution: While you are in the "Foreground" fixing a UI bug, you can tell the Agent Manager in Ag to spawn three other agents.
Agent A: Writes documentation.
Agent B: Updates your PowerShell backup scripts.
Agent C: Optimizes your Gita JSON API calls.
The "Artifact" Trail: You don't just see a black box. Ag produces "Artifacts"—task lists, plans, and even recordings of the agent's internal browser—so you can audit its "thoughts" like a Senior Architect.
## Summary: Your Role has Changed
You are no longer a "Developer" in the 2024 sense. You are now an Architect.
You define the "Tech Stack Constitution" (e.g., "Use React, but keep the Gita API keys in
.env").The Orchestrator (Ag) ensures the "Constitution" is followed.
The Brain (Gemini 3.1 Pro) does the typing.
The Bottom Line: Your human mind is boggling because you've just realized you've gone from being a "solo pianist" to a "Conductor of an AI Symphony."
Since you are a software developer, would you like me to help you create your first ARCHITECTURE.md file for your Gita project? This is the "Instruction Manual" that tells the Orchestrator AI exactly how you want your code to be structured so it doesn't "hallucinate" a different style.
However, to complete the picture for 2026, there are three additional tools that sit in the "Software Development" category which you haven't mentioned. They are less about the "coding" and more about the "plumbing" and "mini-apps."
1. Google Opal (The "Mini-App" Builder)
If AI Studio is for full web apps, Opal is for "Agentic Workflows" or mini-tools.
The Dev Angle: Google recently added an "Agent Step" to Opal. Instead of just a static prompt, you can build a tool where an agent autonomously decides which tools (Search, Sheets, or your Gita API) it needs to finish a task.
Use Case: You could use Opal to build a "Gita Quote of the Day" internal tool for your blog that automatically selects a verse, finds a relevant image, and drafts a social media post.
2. ADK (Agent Development Kit)
This is the "Pro" version of orchestration. While Antigravity is an orchestrator, the ADK is the framework you use if you want to build your own orchestrator or custom agent.
The Dev Angle: It includes the A2A (Agent-to-Agent) Protocol, which allows different agents to talk to each other.
Use Case: If you wanted to build a custom "Gita Expert Agent" that other developers could call from their own apps, you would use the ADK to define its memory and tools.
3. Google Colab Enterprise (AI Notebooks)
While you mentioned you view NotebookLM as separate, Colab is very much a developer tool. In 2026, it is no longer just for Data Science.
The Dev Angle: It now has full Gemini 3.1 Pro integration for writing Python and SQL. It’s perfect for testing your Gita API’s data processing or running "one-off" PowerShell-to-Python migration scripts in a sandbox.
## Summary Table of your Complete 2026 Stack
| Category | Tool | Best Used For... |
| Active IDE | Antigravity | Your main "Foreground" coding (React/Expo). |
| Background Agent | Jules | Automated PRs, bug fixes, and "Chores." |
| Terminal / Scripts | CLI | PowerShell automation and local file analysis. |
| Rapid Prototype | AI Studio | "Vibe Coding" an idea from scratch in 5 mins. |
| Cloud Full-Stack | Firebase Studio | Maintaining a repo with a live Cloud VM & Preview. |
| Custom Agents | Opal / ADK | Building "Mini-apps" or custom AI logic for others. |
The Model: Gemini 3.1 Pro is indeed the "Central Brain" that powers all of these.
Next Step: Since you are managing several projects, would you like me to help you set up an Opal Mini-App that can automatically monitor your GitHub issues for the Gita repo and suggest fixes?
Comments
Post a Comment